[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
FOX BTFO
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /co/ - Comics & Cartoons

Thread replies: 105
Thread images: 18
DEADPOOL CRASHING AND BURNING

WORST COMIC BOOK MOVIE OF 2016 CONFIRMED

>Most comic book movies are meant to appeal to 12-year-olds. Deadpool is the first one feel like it was actually written by one. Gleefully puerile and deeply immature, it has tons of what the MPAA calls “adult content,” but no actual content for adults. It’s a non-stop parade of dick jokes (and ball jokes), bloody violence, and breaking the fourth wall. In other words, it will be the favorite movie of 2016 of every underage boy who sneaks into it next weekend. Others need not apply.

>The title character, star of a wide variety of Marvel Comics, is a fast-talking mercenary; not, as he’s quick to point out over and over, a superhero. Armed with a pair of swords, a bunch of guns, and a demented sense of humor, Deadpool’s basically what would happen if you took Jim Carrey’s character from The Mask, gave him an R rating, and taught him how to do parkour. (“S---, did I leave the stove on?” he wonders aloud right before he decapitates a guy in the middle of a multi-car freeway crash. A generous admirer could describe him as “pure id.” A less appreciative viewer might go with “the most obnoxious movie character ever.” They would both be correct.

http://screencrush.com/deadpool-review/
>>
>>79651038
FOX pay attention to rotten tomatoes instead that literally who, if he want to hurt deadpool he would want to put his review here
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/deadpool/
>>
>>79651038
So this guy is complaining about the thing that everyone who is excited for the movie is excited about. It's not like we don't know what the movie's jokes will be like. We've had plenty of clips.
>>
>>79651069
I didn't know literal children were allowed to review movies.
>>
>>79651108
Well, children are apparently allowed to write them so anything goes I guess.
>>
>>79651093
I don't know, he seems like he readily recognizes Memepool without even being aware of what Memepool is.
>>
File: 1365904964464.png (178 KB, 700x800) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1365904964464.png
178 KB, 700x800
>>79651069
>100%

Are we living in an alternate universe? How is this even possible?
>>
>>79651495
Don't worry, it'll drop to 50% because muh children and muh violence.
>>
>>79651108
>>79651495
>Shitting on a movie because it has positive reviews
>It isn't even out yet
This is a new low, /co/.
>>
>>79651511

Tomatoscores don't tend to drop that much.

Unless all the current reviews are paid up I don't see how it can drop below 80&.
>>
>>79651528
>This is a new low, /co/.
>new low
No it isn't.
>>
File: image.jpg (54 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
54 KB, 1024x768
>mfw all the reviews for this keep lumping it or comparing it to MCU movies

What.
>>
>>79651528
You act like that's something new here
>>
>>79651038
>next weekend.
What?
Already?
>>
>>79651568

MCU is the current standard of quality for superhero films.
>>
File: 1439936346285.gif (2 MB, 320x287) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1439936346285.gif
2 MB, 320x287
>>79651038
>if you took Jim Carrey’s character from The Mask, gave him an R rating
>>
>>79651644
I thought that was the Dark Knight.
>>
>>79651802
not since 2011
>>
File: DOFP.jpg (62 KB, 480x800) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
DOFP.jpg
62 KB, 480x800
>Its a "Fox movie does well so lets find something to hate about it" thread
>>
>>79651495
It isn't out yet, so nobody's seen it. The 99% want to see score is based largely (as with almost all RT scores prior to release) on bot activity, which is why they killed off previewing user reviews prior to release. There's not a lot they can do about bots gaming the system other than that (or coming up with a smart way of identifying accounts that are used to game scores).

>>79651069
Most of the reviews currently on RT are literally who's.
>>
>>79651644
Only among cattle.
>>
>>79651093
>complaining about the thing that everyone who is excited for the movie is excited about
yeah, only waypool faggots waited for this
>>
>>79651038
>Gleefully puerile and deeply immature, it has tons of what the MPAA calls “adult content,” but no actual content for adults. It’s a non-stop parade of dick jokes (and ball jokes), bloody violence, and breaking the fourth wall. In other words, it will be the favorite movie of 2016 of every underage boy who sneaks into it next weekend.

That sounds already better than the majority of MCU titles. what the fuck do they expect "Adult content" out of a comic movie? Anna Karenina? Tolkien?
>>
>>79652093
>only waypool faggots waited for this
>moviepool is based on kellypool
>>
File: 1442689163049.jpg (150 KB, 765x671) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1442689163049.jpg
150 KB, 765x671
>>79651528
>new
>>
>>79651069
>caring about RT
Kill yourself.
>>
>>79651069
>>79651038
>100%
shitposter from /tv/ got BTFO hard, nice.
>>
Doesn't he realize that, that's Deadpools whole thing? I being immature, being a dumbass and not giving a fuck; oh and breaking fourth walls constantly.
>>
>>79652167
> FOX can't paid for good reviews
Go back to tv you atustic faggot.
>>
>>79652135
>moviepool is based on kellypool
repeating this won't make anyone believe it
>>
>>79652314
okay, why moviepool is waypool? Any arguments?
>>
>>79652342
It’s a non-stop parade of dick jokes (and ball jokes), bloody violence, and breaking the fourth wall.
>>
>>79651038

This reviewer sounds most butt-hurt.
>>
>it has tons of what the MPAA calls “adult content,” but no actual content for adults

I wish it could have more of the later, to be quite frankly honest.
>>
>>79651773
The Mask was good though. Not awesome, but it's quotable and had it's clever gags.
>>
>>79651825
While there is some hating on X-Men because they're not in the MCU, it's also because they're hardly the fucking comic characters some movies and many just aren't that good in general. Deadpool, on the other hand, is the first time we're really getting close to the source material and that's something that should be supported. Even MCU fans can get behind that idea of showing FOX that the X-Men can be more than black leather and random names/powers slapped on everyone.

I don't care that the mutants are with Fox, I was a huge X-Men fan growing up. I just want better fucking movies. Compromising in 2000 for X-Men when superheros weren't well proven when it comes to being more faithful to the source material is one thing... we're past that point now. First Class showed some promise, JLaw and some other choices aside... but then we backslide to the usual shit of DoFP which just isn't that well written. The Wolverine was mostly awesome... the downside of the usual schlock of Silver Samurai being a fucking mecha suit and Viper being an insert mutant... it still felt closer to a Wolverine comic than we had gotten up to this point.
>>
File: 0CegOGs.png (52 KB, 256x312) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
0CegOGs.png
52 KB, 256x312
>>79651495

>tfw Deadpool will be critically superior to bvs
>>
>>79652387
>It’s a non-stop parade of dick jokes (and ball jokes)
So?
>bloody violence, and breaking the fourth wall.
Just like Kellypool with characters from Kelly's run.
>>
Deadpool seems like it's great if you're in the demo and otherwise good luck. Maybe you'll like it?
>>
>>79652421
ask yourself what's the real difference between waypool and kellypool because both of them have violence, dick jokes and 4th wall breaking
>>
>>79652410
IT'S A TOMMY GUN
>>
>>79652486

stop saying the words waypool and kellypool, they aren't things.
>>
>>79651773
>>if you took Jim Carrey’s character from The Mask, gave him an R rating
When are we going to get that?
>>
>>79652531
waypool gave me cancer so yeah its a thing
>>
>>79652535
Wasn't that what The Mask comic book was, basically?
>>
>>79652531
Yes they are. Waypool is a bunch of nonsequitors thrown together with no plot whatsoever. Way even said he never planned more than 2 or 3 issues ahead.
Every other form of Deadpool is not that.
>>
>>79651038
Why is he using The Mask as a negative? Ddeadpool might or might not end up being trash but The Mask was pretty good
>>
File: 0KoPz.jpg (63 KB, 475x356) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
0KoPz.jpg
63 KB, 475x356
>>79651038
This reviewer seems to have a general disdain for the character of deadpool from the get go. I doubt he would give the movie a good review even if it was a masterpiece.
>>
>>79652623
without jim carrey's showmanship it probably wouldn't have been good.
>>
>>79652552
>>79652555

shhhh
>>
>>79652200
>/tv/ fag this mad
topkek
>>
>>79652635
deadpool isn't for everyone
>>
>>79652658
Yeah, but he's explicitly mentioning Jim Carrey's version in that comparison. There was even a terrible Mask sequel he could have used as an example but didn't.
>>
>>79652658

that's not an argument.
>>
>>79652704
I'm just saying
I"m not sure if ryan renolds is a bad actor or he just keeps ending up with bad scripts but I have never seen a movie with ryan renolds that I liked.
>>
>>79652724
I know, I just like jim carey a lot as a kid and wanted to mention it.
>>
>>79652623
Guy seems to take himself too seriously. One of those "i only like mature movies for mature adults such as my self" type of guys
>>
File: 1451073213907.jpg (162 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1451073213907.jpg
162 KB, 1000x1000
>>79652486
Yes, they have both of those things, but they are in different amounts, which is the key difference. Waypool relied too much on random wacky humor and felt aimless, while Kellypool had a method to the madness and did the random wacky schtick more sparingly, which actually made it funny.

Nice try, though.

>>79652531
They absolutely are. Writers are capable of making characters so wildly different that labeling them by the name of the person who wrote them is the only logical thing to do. That and it's simply shorthand when referring to a certain writer's run and is more convenient.
>>
>>79652704

Who cares? the reviewer is an idiot.
>>
Screencrush loved Man of Murder.

Opinion discarded.jpeg
>>
>>79652699
Yeah, but that doesn't automatically mean he has to call the movie shit. I know Steven Universe isn't my kind of thing, but that doesn't mean I don't recognize that it is good for the people it appeals to.
>>
>>79651038
I don't get it, what did he expect?
>>
>>79652760
Kellypool sure isn't praised because of its jokes. Nice try, though.
>>
>>79651568
What are the eyes on that thing
>>
>>79652742

Jim Carey was my favourite as a kid.
>>
>>79651038
That's kind of what I feared it would be like. This critic could for all I know just be cranky and contrarian, but I gotta admit, this sort of crappy overplayed humor is exactly what I imagined could be the movie's downfall.

>>79651528
>new
Yes, you are.
>>
File: 1451506147857.png (233 KB, 480x480) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1451506147857.png
233 KB, 480x480
>>79651069
>No AV Club review yet
I bet you they'll give it a bad review
>>
File: fedorious.jpg (67 KB, 400x400) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
fedorious.jpg
67 KB, 400x400
>>79652052
>>
>quirky, t3h P3NgUiN 0f d00m so le randum XD memepool is hollow unfunny garbage

Color me shocked
>>
>>79651038
>A generous admirer could describe him as “pure id.” A less appreciative viewer might go with “the most obnoxious movie character ever.” They would both be correct.
Sounds like the movie is going to live up exactly to my expectations.
>>
>>79652963

you're cute.
>>
File: ржач.jpg (86 KB, 800x533) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
ржач.jpg
86 KB, 800x533
>>79651528
>movie isnt even out yet
>100% from critics on tomatoes
>>
>>79652410
*its
>>
>>79651104
was this post deleted due to "sage"?
>>
>>79652788
man of steel was a good movie
>>
>>79654314
When will this meme die?
>>
File: literally.jpg (277 KB, 1480x1080) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
literally.jpg
277 KB, 1480x1080
>>79651038
>Armed with a pair of swords, a bunch of guns, and a demented sense of humor
Literally me.
>>
>>79651038
>making the same pose as Duke Nukem Forever
UH-OH
>>
>>79652177
>the movie is shit because Deadpool is lolsorandom
>B-but that's what Deadpool is supoosed to be like!
Do you see the problem?
>>
>>79652128
>what the fuck do they expect "Adult content" out of a comic movie? Anna Karenina? Tolkien?
Yes? Every time you sit to watch a movie you expect something good, after all.
>>
Who cares what other people think about it? Watch it and see for yourself
>>
File: sit_the_fuck_down.jpg (75 KB, 384x574) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
sit_the_fuck_down.jpg
75 KB, 384x574
>>79651495
>/co/'s face when BvS scores 100%
>>
>>79653284
There were advanced screenings.
>>
>>79652826
I think that's an eel. Only one eye is visible, it's the little white circle at the end.
>>
>>79651038
>Matt Singer
>praises everything MCU
>indifferent or critical about WB/DC

yeah no bias AT ALL
>>
>>79651802
If its funny, you compare it to the MCU.

If its serious, you compare it to TDK.

Its not that hard.
>>
>>79656964
BvS will get lower 80's, CW will get mid 90's. /co/ will implode.
>>
File: 1445960187639.gif (745 KB, 375x304) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1445960187639.gif
745 KB, 375x304
Reminder that co is tumblr.
>>
>>79658088
Do you do this for free or for a fee?
>>
>>79658158
I thought co was /pol/?
>>
>>79656410
>I like serious comics for adults such as myself.
>>
>>79658542
>there is only serious or lelsorandumb, always
Casual pls
>>
>>79658542
>edgelord comics for edgelords such as myself
That's literally what Deadpool is.
>>
>>79651537
They drop fast on the release weekend because that's when the majority of reviews go live. At the moment it has 28 from a field anywhere between 28 and ~200 reviews total.

If it stayed at the current number of reviews, obviously it wouldn't drop. But with just 28 additional reviews, let's say, it would drop from the current 96% (all reviews, which is the larger and more relevant sample in this instance) to as little as 48% (if every one of the following 28 reviews gave it an unprecedented 0). If every one of them finds it to be, say, a 75%er, then it's an 85.5% score; if they give it 50% then it's 73%, and so on.

That's with just 56 reviews total, which is probably unlikely. The Dark Knight Rises has 326 reviews counted on RT; Fantfourstic, which got far less attention and is a more recent and possibly more relevant example, got 205 reviews (of which 19 or ~10% certified it "Fresh") and of course also started (prior to the first reviews) on 100%, because RT is a badly structured site.

So if we assume that Deadpool will receive 200 reviews, then the lowest it could go in the above scenarios is 13% ("Rotten") on all 0-scores; 78% (all 75-scores), 56% (all 50-scores), and so on.

Just as all 0-scores are statistically unlikely (though there may be a few), so too are 96% scores or even 90% to 100% as a range; what is more likely is a range of scores between 0 and 100 with the mean average falling somewhere that we can't really predict on 15% of the expected sample. If the sample turns out to be much higher - in the 300 region - it could go anywhere scores-wise, even below 10%. If the sample is much lower, the overall score is, paradoxically, likely to sink that much faster - as we would expect in that case that nobody even wanted to watch it to review it, and so the scores of those who did might be that much lower as a result. Notably, the Top Critics' actual scores awarded aren't 5/5, but typically much lower - this does not bode well for RT scores.
>>
>>79653284
Do you not know how critic screenings work?
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTJifjW7hFY
>>
File: 1275026511499.jpg (15 KB, 312x247) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1275026511499.jpg
15 KB, 312x247
>>79651528
>new

so are we all replying to this guy with reaction faces now?
>>
>>79651038
So it's basically Waypool movie, figured as much.
>>
File: deepsea pepe.jpg (88 KB, 625x547) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
deepsea pepe.jpg
88 KB, 625x547
>>79651568
>>
>>79651038
>Deadpool’s basically what would happen if you took Jim Carrey’s character from The Mask, gave him an R rating, and taught him how to do parkour
Im sorry, is this supposed to be a bad thing?
>>
>>79651568
>Ah, hello. Was it you that rang the Bell of Awakening?
>>
>>79651038
this seems like he is mad a deadpool movie is about deadpool
>>
>>79652535
But he's perfect as is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8VqdhNnwdY
>>
>>79651038
>Deadpool acts like deadpool
>worst movie ever

this guy is retarded
>>
>>79662740
You know the comic version of the character is a lot more violent, right?
Thread replies: 105
Thread images: 18
Thread DB ID: 513856



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.