Is there any superhero who is supposed to be likable (ex. not Namor) but is bad in the sack?
It always feels like writers give their pet characters footlong dicks w/ marathon endurance or vaginas that could give their own swedish massage
Well desu most superpowers lend themselves to added perks during sex. I'd like to see a writer convince me that even with his agility, flexibility, super strength and super endurance than Spider-Man is shitty in bed. Likewise, you'd have a hard time convincing me that a guy who can vibrate any of his body and move at super speed with a refractory period that can probably be measured in seconds like the Flash wouldn't be able to please a woman.
>I'd like to see a writer convince me that even with his agility, flexibility, super strength and super endurance than Spider-Man is shitty in bed
Namor has all of that and he is canonically shitty in bed just because writers dont like him
Most comics are pretty much sexless. Good thing, since fanboys freak out over a guy just having a bulge. Cannot imagine how pathetic the reaction would be if they actually talked about or shown sex.
I can see Namor being shitty in bed, though, because he's a conceited, self-centred, self-important douche who'd probably give little to no thought about how the other person feels.
when superheroes are written to be good at sex, it's not just good, they're gods at it
like good at sex doesn't get your girlfriend to nickname you after how many orgasms she had on your first date
Majorly jaded billionaire playboy hovering between mid 30s and 40s with E.D. Is totally within my suspended disbelief window, him not playing with manufactured superpowers is pushing it though. Tony Stark presents: Kevlar brand invulnerability drink. Worried about bullies or school shootings? Drink up kid. Worried about that tornado coming through your trailer park? Don't move just chug one of these.