Doctor Strange

>>78751519
Why would I?

>>78751519
Moderately

Better to let yourself be surprised in the theater rather than nitpicking every bit of info to death

>>78751573
Because you've read comics?

>>78751609
If you're a comic fan you shouldn't be excited for live action crap

Never read any Doctor Strange, also I don't really like Cumberbatch as an actor. He's too hammy. That combined with my general dislike of the MCU means I'm not hyped.

>>78751646
>If you've read a comic and enjoyed it you shouldn't enjoy seeing it translated to film
Ok.

No.

File: 1397274510016.jpg (14KB, 330x247px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 330x247px

>>78751676
>Never read any Doctor Strange
I'm sorry for your loss.

Doctor Strange isn't in that many cartoons or adaptations before this, and /co/ doesn't read comics, so it's doubtful anyone here is hyped.

>>78751519
literally who

>two of the worst actors in the recent memory
Why should I?

Im in the state I was with GoTG and Ant-Man, Im crossing my fingers and hoping it isnt shit, I hope its at least entertaining and I really really hope that its magic and not fucking science.

>>78751519
Nah.

>>78753017
It's already confirmed to be magic, actually.

>>78751519
This looks like cosplay.

>>78753017
it's the scientific method applied to magic. lots of experiments and hypothesis and seeing if you can pull off the ritual if you use mouse blood and an egg instead of a human sacrifice

>>78751519
Yes

On IMDB page Mads is playing someone unknown

Maybe... Dr...

>>78753319
>LIVE-ACTION
HUH ?

>>78753387
Nah, it's Dormammu

>>78751519
All memes aside, I think Aiden Gillen would be a good Doctor Strange

File: aidan-gillen.jpg (18KB, 449x482px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 449x482px

>>78753422
I see where you're coming from, but his voice kinda doesn't fit

>>78751519
No, its going to be Antman all over again with a meme actor

>>78753405
Doom fans are really really desperate for a live action adaptation where he actually seems like Doom. I don't blame them. Can you imagine how shitty it must be to see your favorite character butchered time after time in multiple live action adaptations? To have the general public never even gt a sense of who that character is supposed to be?

>>78753464
>Antman all over again
Surprisingly good then.

>>78753464
>Antman
>one word
Get out of here you fake nerd.

>>78753464
Benedict >>>>>>>> Meme Rudd

File: why-joaquin-phoenix-would-not-have-been-good-as-doctor-strange-in-new-marvel-movie.jpg (95KB, 596x406px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 596x406px

Is he too JUST to play doctor strange?

>>78753554
Cucumbersandwiches can't act for shit.

>>78753561
too fat

moon knight, eh?

>>78753575
hahahahahah sick meme XD

>>78751519
Who actually gets excited for another forgettable, paint-by-numbers Marvel movie?

>>78753601
not /co/

>>78751519
will he have a philly accent or an english accent?

>>78753513
You mean surprisingly bland, safe, and average.

Just like muh MCU movies to be.

>>78753575
Lel, maybe if you keep making jokes about hi name, people will think you actually know something about his acting ability!

>>78753685
tumblr pls go

>>78753657
>Just like muh MCU movies to be.
As opposed to what thought? DC last released "Superman: the Batman-Style Version" and Fox just released "X2: This Time With Time-Travel". Marvel's the only ones who consistently give movies to characters who haven't gotten films before. The last time Fox did that was in 2005, With Fantastic 4 (2000, with X-Men if you count the Corman F4 films). DC did as recently as 2011 with Green Lantern, but we all know how that turned out. Marvel did it just a couple months ago, and they'll be doing it again later this year. The movies may be "safe" in their formula, but Marvel seems to be the only one willing to actually take risks in what properties they choose.

>>78753708
You first, Reddit! :^)

>>78751519
He honestly looks perfect.

>>78753819
*triggered*

>>78751519
All this shitposting aside.
Yes, yes I am.

>>78751519
Meh, I've been burned too many times getting excited about Marvel films. I'll see it, but I'm not rushing to the theater.

>>78753854
What are you even trying to say, Reddit? Are you mad no one liked your ebin Cucumber Sandwich meme or something?

>>78753575
You know when I saw him do the voice and body acting for smaug in the hobbit I have to say I was impressed.

I think as long as they don't fuck up too bad it will be a decent movie.

File: mystical-strange-005-ew.jpg (155KB, 609x819px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 609x819px

>>78753849
It's more than I could have hoped for, really. I was sure they were going to try to tone it down or something, But they actually gave him the red cape and high collar. The absolute madmen.

>>78753868
>That voice
>calling down the Crimson Bands of Cyttorak
I think I can forgive him looking like an alien for that.

Mads is probably playing Kaluu.

Baron Mordo maybe gets corrupted by Chthon and starts turning bad.

>>78753909
The Crimson Bands of FOX LICENCING ISSUES DUE TO JUGGERNAUT.

File: FanAnn (1).png (153KB, 263x376px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 263x376px

>>78751519
Very. Capeflick I'm most hyped for out of everything in the next 5 years.

>>78753867
*still being this triggered by someone not liking something you do*

>>78751734
I read all of it in about a week and a half this past summer solely because I wanted to be prepared for the movie.
I think I can see why /co/ gets so salty about these now, considering that alI I can think about is how much I now want him to rhyme and call the Cloak of Levitation by name and perform at least 5 of his classic incantations and if he doesn't then it's RUINED FOREVER!

>>78753405
It's not, from what we've heard about Mads' character he's an rebel pupil of the Ancient One. And it's not Mordo because he's already cast.

>>78753854
Yes, you are.

>>78753893
>But they actually gave him the red cape and high collar.
They might make it even higher and give it that scythe shape. In the comics he earns that one a few years in.

>>78751519
I'm quietly optimistic.
Marvel has a proven track record, and, while Dr. Strange is not one of the characters in my wheelhouse, I never actively disliked him.

By comparison, I have a quiet pessimism for Suicide Squad and Dawn of Justice. Man of Steel, while enjoyed by many, did not satisfy my particular desires for a Superman film (it wasn't awful, just not what I wanted). And I have actively disliked Harley Quinn, and Zod.

>>78754153
>by Chthon
Bit random innit?

>>78754325
*this much projection going on in this man's post*

>>78751519
fuck no, who ever gave a shit about him?

Just like no one ever gave a shit about Ant man, that being said... im sure this movie will make a lot of money.

File: 1403923736065.jpg (300KB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 2048x1360px

>>78753811
mcuck getting triggered

>>78753811
Risk? are you fucking serious?

>>78751682
I see you defending MOS and AOU
Fuck off.

File: 3apwNHq.gif (2MB, 321x250px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 321x250px

>>78754402
MoS > most of the mcu

>>78753289
>confirmed
>no trailer yet
>concept art shit

>>78751519
>getting hyped with no trailers

>>78754418
>MOS that high
Truely a faggot.

>>78754395
If you're implying that nothing with the Marvle brandname on it is a risk, I agree.
If that's the case though, what do you think they CAN make that would be a risk?
>>78754418
pfffhahahaha

>>78754395
Why wouldn't I be serious? Do you see DC giving Doctor Fate a film? They barely even give their big names like Wonder Woman anything. She's getting a cameo that will be her first appearance in a live-action wide-release movie EVER. This, after Marvel has already given a film to its family of Space-Rejects and the guy whose power is to have the strength of a human while really small. Yes, Marvel takes risks with its properties, and it is very good at making those risks pay off and having people say "Well of course it succeeded! It's Marvel."

>>78754436
its true, drone.

>>78754560
>dc drone calling a marvel drone a drone
Wow, nice defense

Oh wait, half the marvel movies are pure shit.

>>78754497
marvel can make a movie about cat shit and you drones will make sure it hits 500mill, that doesnt mean shit.

>>78754569
id say only 3 of them are not shit.

>>78754572
>DC drone or troll going full bait
OK

>>78754581
Name them then.

>>78754589
Iron Man 2, Incredible Hulk, Captain America 1

>>78754611
What about WInter Soldier or GOTG or Ant-Man?

>>78754572
What doesn't mean shit? The fact that Marvel actually gives its fans movies based on obscure properties and they sell? That they continue to do this after DC makes on awful Green Lantern film, and then runs back to the two superheros that print them money? I'd say that means a lot, actually.

>>78754589
Iron Man. Winter soldier, Guardians. Everything else is trash

>>78754640
stan lee pls go

>>78754634
reddit

>>78754658
Literally out of arguments.

File: mcuck.jpg (25KB, 500x279px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x279px

>>78754669

The director for this has never made a good movie, so no.

File: 1434475869032.png (265KB, 334x393px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 334x393px

>>78751519
literally who?

>>78754445
Doing a Howard the Duck movie would be a true risk for them. Nothing short of that counts.

>>78754445
Ms Marvel in lewd suits

>>78754640
>That they continue to do this after DC makes on awful Green Lantern film, and then runs back to the two superheros that print them money?

This is, of course, totally different from making Iron Man a main character in Captain America III because shut up, that's why.

>>78754640
Fuck dude, the reason why it's not a risk is because they have a formula with their movies which they replicate with every fucking movie. Ant Man is literally just Iron Man 1 redux, it has nothing to do with how Goddamn well known their super hero property is. Shit man.

A lot of movies come out year round that are much more creative than any of Marvel's shit that are succesful and make money at the box office which aren't relying on name brand or familiarity with any source material, but you won't hear any fucking faggots calling them risks just because it's a Goddamn Marvel Studios film.

>>78754832
its not worth it, they literally cannot comprehend what youre trying to say.

>>78751519
Not hyped enough to stay hyped for ten more months straight. I'll check it out when it gets here.

File: 1419398015445.png (64KB, 244x191px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 244x191px

>>78751519

Ant-man was a poor man's Iron Man so I expect this to be a poor man's Iron Man 2 which basically had leaps in technology that might as well have been magic.

The plot is going to be predictable, the villain will be forgotten as soon as the credits roll, and there will be this overabundance of humor that will keep the audience laughing and reassure them that everything will be all right.

>>78751519
no, marvelshill, I'm not

>>78755120
>people will call it a risk because they have never heard about this character