What are some future safe jobs?

>>1046297
Doctor, engineer, nurse, accountants, managers.

Things that can't be automated and things that take a lot of schooling should be safe.

>>1046502
>law

>>1046297
>Robot knob polisher.

File: 1404013194439.jpg (72KB, 349x722px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 349x722px

>>1046297
Anything that can't be fully automated ya dingus.

>>1046502
>engineer
>not automatable
That's only true for around 5% of engineers. Most are just high level technicians who will proggressively struggle more and more to find jobs through the next decade or so.

I'm one of these technician-engineers and I am working on a plan to automate my own job away.
The ride never ends

>>1046297
Bitcoin mining

Physical therapist, mental health counselor, industrial/organizational psychologist, artist

>>1047221
You don't seem to understand what an engineer does.

Foresters are a safe bet.

You only make 50k a year, but its fucking fun

Teacher.

There will always be little bastards that need a baby sitter.

File: 1343286119835.png (50KB, 266x200px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 266x200px

>>1048585
I was actually looking into that. Too bad it's too late. Spending time doing a little landscaping, hiking, and peaceful quiet outdoors doesn't seem so bad at all.

Fuck this business degree

>>1048585

Why is it fun? What do they do, exactly? How do I become a forester?

>>1046297
politics unfortunately.

Programmer, farmer and mercenary.

>>1046297
data science

File: image.jpg (31KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 306x306px

>>1048794
>Programmer

File: jjabrams.jpg (200KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1600x1067px

the creative industry

>>1046502
Accountants are getting taken out by turbotax. Specifically the economist signalled out accountants as the least defendable against automation.

>>1046297
thank god I work in robotic r&d my job is secure no matter what.

>>1046502
>accountants

Its adding and subtracting.

>>1048957

doubt that

>>1049006
music making can definitely be automated/heavily assisted over time but do you actually see automation taking over writing, acting, directing, editing, lighting, framing ect.?

I don't see it, not in the next 500 years

>>1047221
Technicians are easily automated.

Good luck building a machine that can not only sustain itself but also design new, original, and efficient components. Maybe in ~300 years will we have AI intelligent enough to do so, and at that point we're all fucked anyways.