>>1044652 if the 1 to 10 scale is exponential and you look like the guy in the pic you're a 3, 2 standard deviations below the average - 95.45% of people look better than you, you aren't deformed level ugly but no one jerks off to chris farley
>>1044662 No, 3 - so you can get to 4 with fitness and at that point you could snag a 5 (remember this is exponential so thats not bad, if 6 women are sitting at a table 1 is a 4, 1 is a 6 and 4 are 5's)
The people calling you a 1 don't under stand standard deviations, the elephant man is a 1, in a similar vein I have no actual comparison for what a "10" would be, at an 8 youre life revolves around youre looks (models) a 9 is a supermodel, I don't have an "opposite of elephant man" to compare
But yeh, without a major and obvious deformity you are no 2, and without a possibly life threatening affliction you are not a 1.
>>1044711 I don't mean this in a rude way, but in an insightful one:
What you're doing right now is trying to protect your self image. It's too painful to acknowledge the unacceptable state of your life, so you tell yourself that other people who bring it up are full of shit.
The first step to improving is recognizing that things are bad. I sincerely wish you the best of luck, buddy.
>>1044679 Yeh but thats fucking retarded. No one ever claims they dated anythig less than a 7 because thats a c- (passing) but obviously a 5 is the average and most guys are average looking guys who fuck average looking girls
The scale makes more real world sense and can actually be applied if its exponential. A 7 is the hottest girl in your class (of 36) an 8 would be like an entire school.
Im pretty god damn sure every tom , dick and harry didnt fuck the hottest girl in school but with youre cheesedick scale they sure think they did
1st of all i dont give a single flying fuck what a c- is lol at my school a c- is 60%
the average is not a 5, because in my eyes, 5 is the middle ground between "not attractive but not ugly"
I find the average person (man and woman) to be decently attractive, not automatically fuck worthy but can be with the right personality, so I put them at 7. Then again, I don't live in obese america, this is subject to change wherever you live.
someone slightly below average, like a 5 would be considered "neutral". In order for me to sleep with a 5 he or she would have to be really really compatible.
Anything below 5 is no mans land, not even a nice personality can save you.
Now on the other side, an 8 is reserved for local cutie tier 9 is reserved for instagram model tier 10 is actually paid to be hot tier
of course, this is all completely subjective and only kids with autism care this much about a stupid scale
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.