So the guy that was asking how to derail a train did it
>http://rt.com/usa/233199-oil-derailment-train-safety/
when was he asking?
>>598932630
all fucking day and yesterday
around 15 threads
Holy fuck
any pics of the threads?
fuck the one day I dont get on, I miss something like this
screencap?
>>598932911
didn't take anything I thought it was like spam joke
>>598932488
this- this is beautiful
>>598932488
holy shit
does any media report on the approach he's decided on?
I thought the ww2 train derailment tutorials were hilarious, hope he went for one of these methods
actually, how did he do it?
>>598933788
what where the different methods he was told?
>>598933938
at least two involving some chemicals and batteries, i was never really good with chemistry so i dont remember the exact names. One of them sounded quite pro but might have just been a good troll
>>598932488
isnt it beautiful when a /b/rother finally mans up and leaves his mother's basement to pursue his dreams?
screen cap this atleast?
anyone? I cant, Ive gotta run
>>598933938
I have no idea, but I guess he was told more than just two chemical shits since threads were bretty big
>>598935589
ive only seen one of the threads, but it 404d before i was done pissing myself watching the WW2 vids so no caps here
I thought the conclusion reached was that removal of more than 60" or half that in curved track of track was required to derail and that it was difficult to do quickly and quietly even with military resources? I don't see how chemicals could derail a train unless those chemicals are thermite and you use it to cut a section of track.
>>598933788
the reports just say it was an accident, you faggots better get your tinfoil hats on
>>598936800
guess they used to make better trains - apparently these ones don't need much pushin to hop off these tracks, there's been a similar crash in canada like 3 days ago
>>598936967
make it look like an accident
>>598937583
i wonder if he was good enough to make it look so or did it get covered up later