would it work?

>>585656792
No. Water would only come up in the pip to the same level as the water outside the hull. You'd have to put a pump on that to make it work, and that gets you a water jet engine.

>>585657168
this person is a moron.

Yes it would work. the force of the incoming water would push it up as long as you are going fast enough.

yes but it wouldn't go very fast

>>585657598
It's a trap

Yes it would work. Hop to it anon!

>>585656792
If you're looking for some sort of fucky hydro-brake that will probably shit your dumb ship, then maybe?

it would split in half you morons

How can we tell you if it "works" if you don't tell us what it's even supposed to do? Why exactly would you want water spraying out of the back of your boat?

>>585656792
With enough acceleration, yes.

>>585658076
2/10 made me chortle but terrible actual troll

>>585658679
he's right though

the two halves of the boat aren't connected

>>585658831
It's a cross section you fucking moron obviously the two halves would be connected. the idiot who drew it even stated "very narrow cone". Not "hole that goes all the way through the middle of the boat"

>>585659148
It's a cross section but there is still clearly nothing connecting the two halves of the boat.

>>585659508
Not sure if trolling or just unbelievably stupid

1/10 for making me respond.. idk anon. I mean. We know that water will fill to the top of any area it's allowed to, in this case where the outsides of the boat are.. that level of water it would go up to. If you moved to the right with sufficient enough speed to generate a current into the cone/tube, it may come out and spill but I would be more worried about you going fast enough to even generate it coming out of the "blowhole", because then the fucking back would cave backwards because of science.

and shit..

Wait a minute... your fucking question is too open-sided.

You...want us.. to troll each other.

You fucker.

samefag bc lol fuck ID's>>585659906

>>585659906
I think I'd be more worried about that fact that the back half of the boat would get left behind.

>>585660363
Holy shit is there really another person who is this stupid
IT'S A MOTHERFUCKING CROSS-SECTION

>>585660363
both halves of the boat would still float though, as long as they didn't fill up with water when they fell apart

It looks like the river is running strong against this structure from left to right.

Your attempt to pump water and spray it back against the current will not have any effect.

The open section at the lower right seems prone to flooding and should probably be closed off. I am assuming there is a land mass in the background that the shapes are anchored to.

>>585660618
The front half would be fine but that back half looks like it'd sink pretty quickly

ITT: people who don't understand how cross-sections work

Read the god damn picture, it's a thin tube in the middle of the boat. The boat is fully intact.

>>585660840
Whoa niggerlover, settle down

>>585656792
a new flag for Israel ?

>>585660821
true, maybe if you tied both halves of the boat together with ropes it'd work

>>585660840
wait, this is supposed to be a boat? Why would you want to put a tube in there then?

Is this a bad time to mention I enjoy Gore/Babyfucking? Yes? ok.

>>585660840
this fucking faggot right here thinks he knows how the boat is designed.
ITT: fucking imbeciles

>>585656792
If you want to move the boat only with the impulse of the water pipe, then no, it will not

>>585661489

What the actual fuck did you think it was

File: Fresh Paint-2014.12.17-06.40.37.jpg (23KB, 443x395px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 443x395px

You need propulsion.

>>585656792
i just put a straw in a glass of water and holy shit it flew across the room and hit the wall

It would fucking sink you retard

>>585659661
He might be and drinkgineer. Pretty common in russia to see them.

Still he is sorta right, it´s badly drawn for a normal skematic, there´s nothing saying its a section at all.

>>585661586
Yes, I am a faggot for reading the text in picture. But I don't blame you, reading is hard.

>>585656792
it would work until it sinks

>>585656792
if you kept jumping on the boat or had some motor

>>585658261
Its using the water spraying out at propulsion

File: 1409229422400.jpg (31KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 250x250px

>>585661787
lol you still don't get it.

>>585662044
LOL then no
I was giving the person way too much credit then

Venturi does opposite. Must test schematic in field.

>>585656792
Would make mustard gas.
Do NOT attempt this.

>>585661630
I was thinking its a structure of some kind in the middle of that river. I still was not clear what the tube sprayer is for.

maybe try to turn the river around over time haha

File: 1418793678172s.jpg (12KB, 250x229px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 250x229px

wat

>>585656792
the force of water is equal to the opposite force of the boat pushing the water so the boat would just stays in the same place

Perpetual energy.... Looks totally legit. Fuck physics.

>>585656792
You would just sink your boat.

>>585662838
Why don't you shut your fucking whore mouth you goddamn nigger. I will backtrace your fucking ass because my dad is in the goddamned fbi bitch. I am seal team 6 actual the real-deal kid you better back up before you need some back-up.

File: cb.jpg (49KB, 398x600px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 398x600px

>>585663105

>>585663105
Oh shit dude I'm sorry
I swear to god I won't do it again
Please don't call the cops on me

>>585662838
you'd have a perpetually working fountain though

File: revised boat.jpg (14KB, 389x357px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 389x357px

here, I have fixed it

>>585664739
why would it be moving to the right

>>585665009
the air tube creates air pockets in the water that pull the boat to the right

Yes.

>>585665189
Lol troll science at its best
Also in this design the air pockets create a field around the boat that magically cleans it

>>585658076
/thread

>>585665564
it would seem to make it harder for barnacles to set up. also I think speed lines in the water mean it is a river

still not sure what the water tube in original design is for in that case. maybe fishing?

>>585665927
It
is
a
cross
section
you
fucking
moron

it's a thin tube, not a seam that goes all the way through the boat, retard

>>585666261
with enough force you could simply create a field of air around the boat so it never touches the water

>>585666666

>>585666915
Wasted on a bump...

>>585666915
this is a real thing...our thread is derailed...there is no point

Bamp

File: shark cage variant.jpg (17KB, 389x357px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 389x357px

in this versions the sharks are pulling the boat. the air tube is keeping them with oxygen

>>585667364
YOU FUCKING CUNT

>>585667517
>keeping them with oxygen
Why does that sound like something I would hear in church

>>585667709
>>585667709
with the oxygen yoou can be kept. much like a shark

otherwise you are lost

yeah but the two halves would fall apart because they're not attached?

>>585656792
>>585656792
It depends, is the mass of the water in the pipe enough to sink the boat regardless of it moving or not? If so, then no. If not, then yes.

>>585669070
IT'S A MOTHERFUCKING CROSS SECTION
IS EVERYONE IN THIS THREAD A FUCKING RETARD
PUBLIC MEMO: THE TWO HALVES ARE ATTACHED, IT IS JUST A THIN TUBE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BOAT
IT SAYS SO IN THE DAMN PICTURE

File: image.jpg (60KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 600x450px

>>585669938

File: 1417113759219.png (256KB, 476x477px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 476x477px

>>585669938
it would eventually sink though

>>585669938
dude did you even look at the picture?

THEYRE NOT JOIND

>>585670309
0/10

>>585670188
How? The water would only rise up in the tube to the same level as the water around the boat. It would still float.

>>585669938
but it's a 2-dimensional picture, the tube going through it cuts it in half

>>585660840

ITT: people not understanding how jokes work

>>585670963
because you're a gay nigger

F U C K
Y O U

>>585671124
Yes. A 2-dimensional cross-section of a 3-dimensional boat. Since the tube is explicitly stated to be just that: a thin tube, then obviously it doesn't split the entire width of the boat

>>585666287
ITT OP gets angry because he's stupider than the trolls.

Stop feeding the trolls you dumb cunt.

File: gertge.png (3KB, 389x357px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 389x357px

>>585670963
yupp... this is what would happen

File: 1417832342463.gif (1MB, 480x348px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x348px

well it looks like itll take a crane to get it out

File: boat fountain.jpg (17KB, 389x357px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 389x357px

if you flip it around it is just a platform fountain. maybe to keep sharks alive like in picture

>>585671935
Ideally, the sharks would be weaponized, since they would be the first to spot an intial threat on the horizon. Like a turret-mounted, closed-cage shark missile thing. I promise I haven't had too much to smoke tonight.

>>585666287
the boat is only two dimensions

in order to make a 3d cross section you first need to draw a 3d boat

>>585671935
Shit, it'll take a crane to get that out.

>>585672421
Okay so you are trolling. Because nobody is stupid enough to believe that a drawing being 2D somehow implies that the actual object in the drawing is also 2D

File: image.jpg (36KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x400px

>>585669938
You need to have a closer look at the picture

File: 1407862103771.jpg (16KB, 280x270px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 280x270px

>>585672745
How new are you?

Also check em

>>585661704

gr8 at physics huh?

The water would not even come out the tube

>>585673068
Since I've already explained myself, why don't you explain whatever retarded reasoning you have for thinking it'll break apart or sink?

>>585657598
this person is a moron

the craft would float regardless because the i assume it would be a boat. also even if you pumped the water out it wouldnt propel the boat

autism

The cone on OP's boat is too narrow.

>>585673747
I thought he was pretty clear. You've drawn a 2-D boat, and the halves aren't connected. What the fuck is wrong with you?

>>585673747
Easy, when two halves of an object are separated at sea, it becomes clear that the device will not work. This is inherently true for said object, as it was never in a truly wholesome form.

>>585672745
You underestimate your audience...

>>585673999

trips speaks the truth

>>585674193
or is that overestimate?...

File: image.jpg (28KB, 259x383px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 259x383px

>>585674034
The illustrator is clearly an idiot.

>>585674034
Because the boat in real life would obviously be 3D. You can't build a 2D boat. And since it would be a 3D boat, a thin tube running through the middle of it would not split it in half.

File: jet_drive.gif (21KB, 260x257px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 260x257px

i can't beleive something like this hasnt been posted yet

>>585674372
You've obviously attempted to design schematics for a boat meant to be 2d, how utterly stupid can one life from be?

File: WrappedUp.Foreskin.com.7z.jpg (51KB, 521x562px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 521x562px

>>585674372
You may not be able to build one, but you were stupid enough to draw one.
>>585674368 is correct.

>>585674372
the water in OP's pic is 2d though. I don't know how that would work.

>>585674675
The entire intake and output of water in that system is underwater. OP's is not. Your pic was irrelevant.

>>585674697
>can one life from be?
Retard

File: 1418421491905s.jpg (5KB, 173x146px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 173x146px

>>585656792
>yfw this is more commentary on this generation

maybe op is meant to be in the boat, holding the halves together. but still a little bit apart, for the narrow cone

This thread is still here?
It's a shit design by a shit OP

>>585675083
The boat is 2-D, mate. He can't be on the boat.

>>585674697
By this logic, all schematics ever drawn are for 2D objects

>>585675043
Ey, is - is that you Anonymous? I, I remember you from the next thread over! How's it going?

>>585675278
It would be like riding a tightrope.

File: KurtCoHuehuehue.gif.web.7z.jpg (65KB, 438x453px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 438x453px

>>585675522
A tightrope that can split your fucking atoms, sure.

>>585675278
It'd be like riding a tightrope.

File: science.jpg (51KB, 389x357px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 389x357px

>>585656792

>>585674675

the main difrence about these two designs, They have a fucking engine,which OP´s design dont have. the propellant of going 400mph have a jet that would be enough for going 5mph (random numbers, but you get it)

also OP never stated that the pic would be for propelant, so it may be a question if it floats, the answer yes, if going unbelivably fast in it, it might sink due to the pipe angle, idgaf about that, it would float.

about the design, no walls on either side, but i doubt it was a arkitect making the schematics for this build.

have a good night /b/ let the niggers rape your asses for eternity, my ass is beeing pounded at this werry moment, so see you later faggots

File: image.jpg (34KB, 452x338px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 452x338px

>>585675326
>Being this new.

You cant acquire free energy from nothing.

It wouldnt work.

>>585656792
it would sink because there are no walls on the sides of the boat

File: inbored jet.jpg (15KB, 389x357px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 389x357px

>>585675009
it would work if you added another jet so there is water for the first jet to push against

>>585675880
Yeah? You think just cuz I'm new that means you can flaunt your complete misunderstanding of 2D drawings and have it not look stupid? Well guess what, it does

>>585675951
Clearly you have never tried solar energy

>>585676443
Someone doesn't know how solar energy works..

>>585676443
solar energy doesn't come from nothing though

>>585676443

Nothing? huh... Heat and UV are Energy...
everything is energy. just transferred to another type.

File: image.jpg (184KB, 1536x1536px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1536x1536px

>>585675644
That's a pretty tight tightrope man!

>>585676513
the boat could be made of solar panels. op didn't say

>>585656792
No there's nothing connecting the front to the back. These 2D shapes would just fall apart.

File: image.jpg (12KB, 200x291px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 200x291px

>>585676390

File: 442947.png (84KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1280x1280px

>>585660821
>>585660618
>>585660363

>>585658076
Best post

>>585676627
I honestly can't tell if you're trying to tell me it wouldn't work or not.

>>585671916
what is that nigger doing?

File: assfracture.jpg (69KB, 680x570px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 680x570px

>>585656792
Newton's third law faggots. Force of water being pushed into the tube is the exact same amount of force as the water coming out of the tube = 0 motion

2/10 made me respond

>>585656792
depends on how heavy the boat is.

File: image.jpg (22KB, 258x196px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 258x196px

Do - do you guys hear that? What is it?

File: LONG PERFORATED TUBE.jpg (19KB, 389x357px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 389x357px

>>585656792

>>585677130
Holy shit

>>585658076

File: image.jpg (14KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 275x183px

>>585677130

File: 210_makingtheband_v6.jpg (42KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 480x360px

>>585658076

>>585658076

>>585677186
The initial 2 dimensional issue still hasn't been solved, faggot.

>>585656792
The water release could not be two seperated pieces, but instead a tube, and the bottom of the tube would need to be the lightest material on the boat, there would need to be a value toward the bottom as well

Then yes, it could possibly work

File: image.jpg (67KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x400px

>>585677486

If singles it doesn't work, if dubs it works, if trips or better it works and everyone in this thread gets laid.

if water was pumped into the sky & drained back through the narrow cone, the boat would go in reverse

>>585676292

Goddard loves you

File: image.jpg (168KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 960x720px

>>585677688

File: rofl.jpg (56KB, 476x399px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 476x399px

>>585658076
>>585658679
>31▶>>585659148
>>585658831
>>585659148
>>585659508
>>585660363
>>585660618
this fucking thread
i am kill

Is OP kill?

>>585656792
No it would crash into the shore.

File: mmo.jpg (80KB, 500x625px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 500x625px

>>585673896
This person is a moron.
The boat would immediately sink to the bottom of the ocean where crabs and lobsters would shit and piss all over your faggot boat.

>>585666287
Shit you are getting BTFO

>>585667517
>Sharks

File: 1.png (8KB, 547x350px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 547x350px

>>585657168
>>585657168

>>585656792
nope

>>585678564
lol

>>585678835
you forgot the narrow tube though

File: pulsejet.jpg (12KB, 389x357px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 389x357px

This would work, the cone at the front has a valve cutting off flow that goes back out of the cone at slow speeds.

>>585676390
Oh shit I think OP is actually trolling here

To optimize the current, one should keep one finger on the electrical coil and one finger in the water at all times.

>>585678295
he drowned when his boat sank

>>585679234
I've got fucking sharks, fuck narrow tubes.

File: naziboat.jpg (8KB, 389x357px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 389x357px

>>585679309
wait a sec, what's that?

>>585680089
you stole my shark idea, and you got rid of the narrow tube. face it, your boat is a ripoff

>>585680162
someone knows their history, still is a good and simple engine though...

File: image.jpg (45KB, 400x342px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 400x342px

Water jet system

File: infinite propulsion.png (5KB, 389x357px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 389x357px

If you get it up to speed to start self propelling, would it keep accelerating or stay at the same speed?

>>585680710
For starters, that would be going the other way. Secondly it would lose speed due to friction, but this is implying it would work in the first place.

>>585680710
That would actually go the other way as the water pours back trough the tube and such

>>585676443
you are a fucking moron.

>>585680908
On second thought, that would have no movement. The forces equal out in both directions..

>>585680710
What are those gray things? supports or strings or something? Well, whatever they are, the water wouldn't be able to get past them, as you show it dripping down, because...

IT'S FUCKING 2-DIMENSIONAL
NIGGER

File: 1.png (9KB, 547x350px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 547x350px

>>585679234
Actually fuck you. Here's a narrow tube.

>>585681435
Lasers would burn through the bait rope buecase it is 2D
NEXT

>>585681614
The lasers aren't powerful enough to burn the rope, it's just to satisfy my retarded boss. Fuck you.

>>585681757
Lasers would burn through your retarded boss too
NEXT