claiming ID from old thread.
Any namefags here?
Continue the discussion.
It's not good or bad, simply perceived, education removes these perceptions, it's all about, then, accepting the education, nothings wrong or ill about loli loving, when done safely and responsibly
There is no discussion that hasn't already been settled hundreds of times, just going through the same talking points over, and over, and over again.
Here is my singe 2D image.
Your old gods are dead and not cute. Accept the one true god.
you like to dance close to the fire, don't you?
i'd actually prefer someone to go against me.
But i'd prefer a circle jerk over a dead-silent thread with just images
Too much agreement kills a chat - Eldridge Cleaver
that is not dead which can eternal kawaii
and with strange eons even death may die
Are you trying to say I am in possession of illegal materials?
the thing most people today don't understand is that pedophile is not synonymous with rapist.
Most pedophiles are love their object of desire the same way most normal people do.
Statistically speaking, based on what I've looked into, the percentage of pedophiles that want to rape a child to get pleasure at the child's expense is relatively similar to the percentage of "normal people" that rape adults.
Why someone would want to harm a little loli is beyond me. I'd much prefer to overwhem her with pleasure than with pain.
can you please stop typing words, your spaghetti is ruining my loli thread
Range Murata makes some pretty cute loli
ah, like i said tho, its about education then, to convince them otherwise out of their ignorance, see >>582164601
>the thing most people today don't understand is that pedophile is not synonymous with rapist.
people not understanding is a matter of education
Like Sody too.
Here, I have something printed for you instead, have a nice read.
If things being proven 100% hundreds of times over results in the end of discussing the topic then explain why the ken ham vs bill nye debate happened.
Opinions are made to be changed - or how is truth to be got at?
There are lolicons here that are either closet pedos, non-pedos who like loli and tolerate pedos, or full blown pedo haters like genks.
But opinions are subject to change.
I've actually had serious talks with my friend about pedophilia, and when I try to explain to him that most pedos aren't rapists, he disagrees and suggests a high ratio. I'm guessing 80-90% is what he's hinting at.
Are there any actual studies on this? Not that they'd be very accurate, since most pedos never come out of the closet unless they're on 4chan or they get caught.
>If things being proven 100% hundreds of times over results in the end of discussing the topic then explain why the ken ham vs bill nye debate happened.
I share the Dawkins' foundation's view on this, it had no point at all, Ken Ham is an idiot though.
Funny thing is, I'm not a lolicon at all really.
I beleive it was sarcasm on your posting only one loli image
nah, words are what makes the loli thread.
if you want images only, go to a booru. They have these neat things called tags. You should try them sometime.
from what i've gathered, many pedophiles seem to posses some intellect, and wouldnt go about luring kids into their van with candy, to either they dont get caught or dont attempt anything at all, only tho stupid enough to want to hurt a loli would be seen on the news by people
>Lolis are anime children.
Yes, yes they are.
But anime children are not real children.
Yes, I sarcastically posted that image, but that's really the only anime image I have.
That's besides the point. If you are attracted to child features then you are a pedophile. I'm not condemning anyone because a pedophile is not by default an evil or morally wrong person. I'm just saying, we have to accept the facts.
whereas in reality it's the reverse.
i'm pretty certain that a major part of pedo rapists is just normal rapists that get simply prefer children not due to their physical appearance but due to their lack of ability to resist, hence a power rush.
>If you are attracted to child features then you are a pedophile.
Good fucking god I hate that show and shun everyone who watches it.
refering back to the the ken ham example:
just like "bullshit, creationism never happened." Yet there are people who convince themselves it didn't. Or people who convince themselves they're not pedos.
>Being attracted to child features makes you a pedophile.
Somewhat disputable, but I'll work with you here.
The thing is, lolicons who AREN'T pedos (like moi) aren't necessarily attracted to the childish features. The Japanese animation aesthetic is what gets us going.
Dunno about him but that's the primary reason for why i'm here. It's pretty rare for me to find an image posted by an anon that satisfies my loli desires. Much easier to go through a booru.
But when it does happen, it becomes the icing on the cake.
Speaking of cake, here's a classic for you guys.
Actually... I can totally understand you since I know the appeal to anime cuteness. But i'm sure a lot of lolicons are pedos. And it's a good thing to focus on lolis, they are a nice release. Better than the alternatives.
ew that is ugly. Ill delete it.
etna from disgaea by spazkid
Half of the stuff posted here isn't flat. compare to pic related, only thing I'm able to post...
>implying I don't
>tfw more attracted to cuteness in girls than 'hotness'
And that is why I'm a hebephile.
You know thinking back.. 4chan had a lot do to with my sexual desires... When I first saw /b/ cp threads they scared the fuck out of me. And i avoided them like the plague. Same with trap threads. Now I enjoy both and loli and so much other shit.
oh hey, you actually posted an attractive image. More icing for my cake.
want a legitimate answer?
Because some people actually dislike large breasts, pubic hair, and large hip/body shape on adult females. And when you have those specific requirements/desires they are incredibly specific for hentai and incredibly generic for loli. Why search through a pile of shit to find the golden nugget when you can search through a pile of cake?
I used to look only at hentai (before I found out loli was a thing). Finding the few images without pussy hair proved meticulous and not worth the time.
The dudes taking the pics aren't very nice people... But no, you're not doing any damage to them personally. But some people may have trouble viewing something that may have been made by causing suffering to a child.
sometimes i try to convince myself that i'm only a hebephile
then I remember the experiences I had with the younger agegroup when i was a kid.
What about LS? Or similar modeling agencies that are considered cp? I'm nowhere near delusional enough to think that people that make cp with their close relatives are doing it because they love them.
That's called human. Not everyone wants double D boobs and an ass that's bigger than the rest of her body. Like niggers.
>captcha crib opsyrc
For me it started off with a fascination with innocence and love. I wanted to be loved by someone in very specific ways. I had fantasies of having a little sister to protect. 4chan exposed me to sexualized images of children and I guess it converted that emotion to something more. Not that I mind, I like that I like it, It doesn't have any negative effect on my life, only positive.
good thing I dislike that artstyle and loli boldness then.
busou shinki from baby razz by dd (ijigendd)