Made fun of this alpha nigger thoughout a couple years in highschool
wanted to share best
gen nigger thread
OP is mad because a nigger is destroying white women pussy and he's still fapping on 4chan. Nigger master race.
Well thanks. Now I feel bad calling you a fag.
Now your racism makes sense. Displaced anger at the swarthy coloreds for pounding that tiny white pussy into shuddering oblivion. You are smart enough to at least see what makes you intolerable and fix it. So make that change. You won't ever get that sweet ass but some 6/10 might have pity on you and make you happier than your current shitty self.
OH NOES! IT'S ANONIMOOSE!
Careful OP, they might send you pizzas that you won't have to pay for!
Cuz if there is anyone /b/ will troll, it'll be someone who rips on a coon.
rule 1) sunglass frames must match undershirt
rule 2) ...
Wow Jerry, I don't
even know u but u seem like a real BIG JERK, I
certainly would't b proud to put something like that
up, it makes U look real bad!!! If u cant put
something nice on someones posts than u should
just not put anything up at all! How ignorant and
rude, grow up! Its people like u that make this world
what it is. I think that is a REALLY great picture of
u Reggie, u take awesome pictures and u are a
truly great person <3 [u can delete this comment
whenever u feel like it, I don't want it crapping up ur
post and ruining ur picture....and I would delete the
other one too if it was me)
>tested this out on my optical character recognition algorithm. here's some free pasta
And just like that, i hope you would fuck off.
I dont want you to die or anything, i just wish fucking degenerates like you would be exposed as the awful wastes of space that you are.
Lel, are you upset about the white master race?
Take a look at white accomplishment. Feels fucking good, brah.
>mfw OP abandoned thread after seeing his beta self manifest
Are you upset about having a small brain?
>inb4 brain doesn't correlate with intelligence
Don't be retarded.
Did you not see this?
That would be once, m8.
Well, if you are white, you're being highly fucking retarded. God forbid you take pride in yourself. Yeah, go ahead and suck black cock and make excuses for them when their crime rates are through the fucking roof for no other reason than genetics, but don't be a self-hating white guilt faggot.
>inb4 i'm wrong somehow because you say so
We both know you dont talk think this in public. Lets not pretend you're not trying to be edgy.
You haven't provided any original concepts to this conversation. I put it to you that "retarded" might be believing info graphics you found on the internet to be based in fact without being able to provide any research or evidence of your own.
>doesn't understand I did a lit review on r-K mating strategies and that's why i have this data and shit lying around in the first place
>doesn't think I turned in a paper in uni about how blacks have lower intelligence and higher crime rates
>thinks you have to do your own research in order to learn things
>thinks you can't read about gravity and know about gravity unless you do your own scientific tests on gravity
>think i'm not openly racist to my friends
That's a lot of implications, m8.
ITT, people who got reverse personal army requested by a nigger. Bravo, b, bravo. Angry script kiddies unite! Summer comes early.
>girl bitching overdramatically about don't you insult my fraaaaans
>black guy gives zero response or acknowledgement, just tells the guy whose horse it is
OP got BTFO
Unless this is disguised PA request. Well, I mean, still got BTFO though, either way.
Zero implications, los of inference tho.
If any of that was true (pro tip:It isnt!) You would know that empirical evidence can be observed, tested and repeated ad nauseam. You cant prove a single piece of the "evidence" you're provided for your racist bullshit so can immediately be disregarded off hard.
> Come back with facts.
>come back with facts!
You know that jpg had about 20 studies demonstrating that blacks had smaller brains?
Everything I said was true, m8. Not everybody is bound by the balls by PC culture.
More sources I used.
>The heritability of brain size is extremely strong at 0.90 and not one study to date has shown larger brain size for Blacks, nor has any study shown anywhere close to equal brain size or structure for Blacks and Whites.
>The supragranular layer is 15% thinner in Blacks than in Whites
>I put it to you that "retarded" might be believing info graphics you found on the internet to be based in fact without being able to provide any research or evidence of your own.
You can find those statistics on the FBI's website. You know, FBI.gov.
>We both know you dont talk think this in public.
So wait here, if you're racist you need to constantly talk about it in public? Is this because you might fear being outnumbered or ostracized?
We both know if you were in public Russia you wouldn't talk like this. You know how they're so friendly to your brave rainbow-warrior types over there. You know, recording themselves murdering them in broad daylight.
"Lynn's review work on global racial differences in cognitive ability has been cited for misrepresenting the research of other scientists,"
So hes an untrustworthy source right off the bat
That essentially means he used their research in ways they found distasteful. That doesn't mean it's false. And nowhere does that say that the research he used is wrong. Get off your high horse, chump.
Here's some more facts you can choke on.
>The front of the Black brain is less developed and the back more developed compared to that of Whites
>black as fuck
>on a stolen horse
>not a nigger
u w0t m8?
He's got track history of manipulating data to suit a pre determined means. thats poor science especially when dealing with something like eugenics. The man isn't a respect or even particularly well regarded scientist and all of his data can easily be considered corrupt based on his obvious and public short comings.
If youre going to use a man like rushton in argument, you should be aware than he was unequivocally and categorically against the idea that there was any such this as race superiority.
best the negroids can retort with is
Oh no, you hurt my feelings. I'm a more evolved subspecies with a higher mean IQ, a more balanced physical performance, better vitamin D-intake and better looks, etc. etc. Damn it!
Requested anecdotal evidence, ignoring facts that prove otherwise.
>multicultural in any significant sense
At the same time you ignore the initial point. Red herrings: not even once.
>If youre going to use a man like rushton in argument, you should be aware than he was unequivocally and categorically against the idea that there was any such this as race superiority.
>you should be aware than he was unequivocally and categorically against the idea that there was any such this as race superiority.
>that there was any such this as race superiority.
>any such this as race superiority.
I thought shills had to be literate as a minimal qualification.
No im observing the facts that are provable, testable and repeatable. Anything else is anecdotal.
You have zero first hand experience in what youre discussing, and are therefore unqualified to comment.
Lel. I did cite Rushton quite a bit. He gave me a lot of data. I'm glad you believe he's not racist. He doesn't fucking need to be. The information he gave on r-K history was good and useful.
Also, the absurdity of you saying Rushton isn't racist and is against the idea of race superiority really blows my mind. That doesn't make a difference. And here's what would happen if my only sources were people that hated niggers:
>you can only use people that hate niggers
>you only used people that hate niggers, confirmation bias!!11
East Asian master race reporting in.
All your brain sizes are inferior and belong to us
What original research of your own did you conduct? What proper repeatable large scale social experiments have you conducted?
english isnt my first language no, would you rather we carried this on in a different language?
>No im observing the facts that are provable, testable and repeatable.
By providing none of them.
>This is why i hate arguing with you idiots, it's ether tinfoil or shill when you guys realize your wrong.
I showed, using your own quotations, that you can't construct a sentence properly, let alone an argument. Apparently the word "shills" in concert with your incapacity to construct a coherent rebuttal is too much.
>his is why i hate arguing with you idiots, it's ether tinfoil or shill when you guys realize your wrong.
See above. An argument, like an equation, must be precise. Your opponent is not confined by the principle of charity. It is not their job to infer what you're otherwise unable to convey.
Seriously tho? when was the last time you were in russia? or africa? or asia? maybe somewhere in the middle east? central europe? can you honestly, truthfully have a discussion about people as a whole from your won little corner of the world with other peoples books?
>less than 20g difference
A difference that small makes it scientifically irrelevant, seeing as human brain volume is proportionate to the overall body size.
>Schooled by a white boy
>What original research of your own did you conduct?
What research have you done? Anecdotal evidence provides proof to its observer, not in any meaningful sense.
>would you rather we carried this on in a different language?
Not even that poster, but we could carry this on in Latin, if you'd like.
Don't engage in an argument if its subject matter or medium or communication is not something you're familiar with.
>Seriously tho? when was the last time you were in russia? or africa? or asia? maybe somewhere in the middle east? central europe? can you honestly, truthfully have a discussion about people as a whole from your won little corner of the world with other peoples books?
Again, a red herring. You can attempt to construct arguments on baseless postulations all you'd like, but it only further proves that you have no rebuttal.
No your racist friend has run off and deserted you.
You obviously have a loose grasp on the concepts being discussed if you are using such oblique terms. Have you conducted any original research? I believe the answer is no. Have you ever traveled the world? unlikely, you speak from a position of sheltered ignorance it seems.
Ive never claimed to be involved in this field, but ive read enough to know that you are full of shit.
>What a fucking moron you are.
I thought i was supposed to be the only non native english speaker here! (im joking i get the mistake)
Really tho, neither of you are capable to proving empirical evidence to support any claims you make. you can cite untrustworthy and ruined eugenicists and racists but you cant prove anything you claim to believe. I dont need to prove i am right, i only need to prove you are not and the fact will do the rest for me.
>Have you conducted any original research?
You asked him that, and I did the same to you. My question goes unanswered. This is, obviously, a resounding "no."
>Have you ever traveled the world?
In order to produce what, anecdotal evidence? Subjectivity is a tool those without evidence use.
"If the facts are on your side, pound the facts into the table. If the law is on your side, pound the law into the table. If neither the facts nor the law are on your side, pound the table."
>Ive never claimed to be involved in this field, but ive read enough to know that you are full of shit.
>neither of you
I assume you're including me but are too lazy to quote. If you had, you'd see I mentioned fbi.gov as a source for crime statistics based on race.
>I dont need to prove i am right, i only need to prove you are not and the fact will do the rest for me.
Of which you have provided none. This isn't reddit, nor is it a college campus where your progressive, utopian-esque opposition to people you perceive as racist is blindly applauded. I await your next red herring, though.
Like i said, You came here with lies and falsehoods, everyone in the world knows you're talking bullshit and you are working on twisted, corrupt broken science. Your "facts" fall down when left by themselves.
Until You can prove unequivocally that you are right, the entire world with believe you to be wrong.
>scientists dont disprove anything, they prove facts and allow the absence of facts to stand as proof.
Here's how I will prove that blacks are less intelligent. Ready? Pay attention, you progressive thinker.
Look at this jpg. >>544413761 This jpg has 19 sources. Some old, some new. They all come to one conclusion. Blacks have, on average, smaller brain sizes. Okay. You still with me? Things are going to get complicated (for you, anyways).
Now... let's look at what the modern literature says about brain size and intelligence.
>Correlations between human brain size and intelligence have been well established
Okay.. maybe another source will help?
the correlation between brain size and general intelligence or abstract reasoning among 25 primate species is strong, the "correlation between raw brain weight and general mental ability is 0.7653."
Thus can be concluded, blacks are, on average, less intelligent than whites.
Research provided by a center that went bust in '11.
Lets not kid ourselves on that you are ever going to be able to "prove" anything that you believe.
Nobody should ever try to stop you from believing it, in the same way that you should probably stop trying to convince people that your lies are facts.
The next time you're talking to someone more intelligent than you and you take time to notice the colour of their skin, youll remember this conversation.