It sucks to say it, but if an animal has cancer, you should just put it down. The animal is going to go through hell if you put it through chemo, and it still could very easily die, after you spend thousands for a one year old cat. Simply not worth it. Think of all the other animals lives you could save with that money.
>>2055656 Not the anon your talking to but OP clearly said "would it be okay to....". The rules of 4chan are broad, and if he isn't familiar with /an/ he could think that we run things a little differently. He was just asking a goddamn question and people jump on him like a bunch of niggers. Chillax bros, He's obviously not going to post a link for it now.
>>2055669 What this poster said. It's not going to understand why you're making it suffer so horribly. It's just going to know that you're making it suffer horribly. You'd have to be a total asshole to put an animal through this.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.