So a pedo is defined as having a sexual preference for children,

A regular person.
For law purposes you're only a pedo if you either incur in sex with kids or have/watch child pornography.

>>16778411
an equal-opportunity creep

>>16778411
As a girl who did a lot of lewd shit with older guys since the age of 11, can confirm that 99% of guys would totally bang adolescents-young teens if it was legal and socially acceptable. All the guys I was lewd with were just regular guys, all of them were hesitant at first but they still went for it.

>>16777777

Roughly 90% of child molesters who are pedophiles also report that they are sexually attracted to adults.

Don't molest children and you're fine.

To be absolutely and horribly honest, every human being is already a pedophile, just thinking about it for a millisecond makes you one.

Hell, back in the very olden days, people were having babies in their teens, hence why so many died before hitting 60 or 70 since they were killed off by war or accidents or disease.

>>16778411
Please kill yourself.

>>16778411
Extremely thirsty for some action.

>>16778528
can confirm this. guys absolutely would if they get the opportunity

>>16778411
It makes you a pedophile (<11), a hebephile (11-14), a ephebophile (15-19), and a teleiophile (adult), concurrently:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronophilia

Hey, at least you're not a Nepiophile (0-3) or a Gerontophile (Elderly)

A paedophile is anyone who has sexual interest in young children. You're a paedophile. That's not the same as people a sex offender though.

>>16778411
Actually according to dictionaries, a pedophile is just someone who is sexually attracted to kids.
Apparently you aren't a kid when you're over 11 though.
The thing about a pedophile having to be attracted ONLY to children is nonsense.
Wouldn't you call someone who fucked corpses once in a while, even though they're also turned on by living people, a necrophiliac?
>>16778528
This is either bullshit or I'm part of the 1%, which I find rather unlikely.
What is more likely is that you've experienced it like this, because you've actively sought out douches.

>>16779721
That's what you'd like it think. You wouldn't know unless you've actually been in a position where you really could. If you have then nice, good for you, you can say you don't with pride. But nah, I didn't go for douches. I dated and messed with a whole range of people, mainly guys who were in uni or just graduated. Some guys where shyer than others, all had different social statuses, some were more hesitant than others. They were all pretty normal guys with normal lives