I just have one question about Re: .
Why the heck was Noro there during the Tsukiyama Extermination operation?
This was between the CCG and the Tsukiyama, Aogiri didn't have a stake in it. And even if it did, there should have been a lot more Aogiri ghouls showing up, but instead Noro just charged in on his own and got himself killed.
And saying Eto ordered him to show up 'for the lulz' or to so called 'make things interesting' isn't a valid reason either.
Maybe the reason I'm so salty about this is that Ishida squandered such a mysterious character
Did they say they wanted a Q sample? Or is it just speculation?
I just find it quite dumb that Noro just randomly attacked one of the strongest CCG squads and died for no reason at all.
>Maybe the reason I'm so salty about this is that Ishida squandered such a mysterious character
Some characters in the manga are just build-up for the main ones. The whole point of Noro was to show that zombie-like characters can exist and to possibly foreshadow this happening to Kaneki. He never really existed as a person.
>to possibly foreshadow this happening to Kaneki
Anon, stop don't say these bitter things!
Kanou went over to Aogiri a long time ago, during the manor arc. I have no idea why you think he was aligned with V.
>Gosh, Tokyo Ghoul is definitely a series you don't wanna speed read.
Considering this sentence is almost structurally designed to trigger /a/ I'm just assuming this is bait now.
I think we are thinking noro was a single personality rather than one of those mouths that is on eto's kagune. Maybe there was no Noroi consiousness there. Just a parasite controlling the body.
Back in part 1, S rank ghouls were still a big deals. These days though they are literally fodder. Akira casually owned two S rank Ghouls back in the Auction arc and she's hardly anything special besides being fairly skilled at using her quinque.
now if you are not SS ranked, you literally don't matter to any named CCG character.
You're making no sense.
You just admitted that they are different. One was good once, while the other was never good.
Since they are different, it makes perfect sense to say "I'm reading one but not the other". Just because I ate an orange once, doesn't mean I ate all oranges in the world.
Whether they attract the same audience or not is irrelevant, as you were caught up on someone saying he's reading one but not the other.
Get your issues sorted out before trying to talk about them.
I never said they were the same, I said they attract the same type of audience that is unintelligent 12 year olds because those are the only ones taking this manga seriously.
Tell that to Hairu and Kijima.
And who did Akira own exactly ? Naki is the only one I recall and he is as low tier S as it gets.
I agree that the power creep is real but it isn't as bad as you portray it.
>I never said they were the same
Yes, you did. As seen in >>138422433 "unironically reading Naruto" and "being [allowed] to post on /a/ about you reading naruto", then later once again implied it in >>138422941
>I said they attract the same type of audience
No, that wasn't in your original posts, and only got added in >>138423648 but not as a separate point or issue, but as an afterthought to your main point, that is, that Naruto and TG are the same thing.
Akira had the upper hand against Miza before the latter ran away.
Kijima's death was literally comic relief but I concede on Hairu, though I doubt she would have lost if it wasn't for her retarded slip on blood.
>but the anime
No, there's no difference between the anime or manga. You have a superiority complex
>this implied that so that's why I accused you of X
see here the coherent flaw apparent in the audience reading Tokyo Ghoul unironically
I actually like that gif, though the creator should've had the centipedes multiply as the mask changed in the Kakuja stage, as well as had the mask fade away and the Kagune to become a chaotic mass with one of Kaneki's orbits being empty, then have both be empty before the Haise bit.
Also I'm pretty sure Akira fought off either Miza or Hakatori in the auction.
Anon, please try to pay attention, >>138423977 doesn't say that you only implied that Naruto and TG are the same, it states that you both clearly stated, and then later also implied it.
This is just a personal comment, but I also find it humorous that you'd be the one to tell others that they have superiority complexes.
Anon, there is no "no you" in that post.
If you're trying to respond to the personal comment, as stated, that is just an aside and not a part of the main body of the post, nor does it attempt to be a main point in the discussion.
It'd be preferable if you didn't ignore the points that actually address your argument in favor of taking it upon yourself to be insulted by perceived implications.
>Akira had the upper hand against Miza before the latter ran away.
The "own" term does not apply then, I dare say.
Cause if you beat up Kaneki you automatically level up to parents or love interest status.