Let's settle it, anons. http://strawpoll.me/6801452

Jesus all you degenerates need to go die.

>>137371900
I wonder which you are

>>137371900
Why don't you lead by example?

File: 1455140241568.jpg (21KB, 240x260px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 240x260px

>>137371900
>implying taste is objective.

File: bdfb5f8c-124f-4c48-cc33-c75462706576.png (3MB, 2266x1605px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2266x1605px

Please, please, PLEASE don't let this shit ruin Galko threads.

>>137371984
>1984 get

>>137371984
It is when you are talking about used up whores.

>being pure
>2016
2003 called. It wants it's meme back.

>>137372012
As long as people fall for crappy bait, that shit will ruin every thread it appears in, including this one.

>>137371693
It's over, /v/ won and took over the board.

It's been a pleasure guys.

>>137372088
purityfags were absolutely never the majority and it's time to admit it

>>137372173
But we sure were loud, now... just look at this.

File: 1454440477581.jpg (118KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 960x540px

>>137372025
>had 1-3 sex partners
>whore

Pick one

>>137372246
>not saving it for the one you love
Complete and utter filth

>>137372088
You complain, but you're still responding to it.

>>137371693
I can't answer this, it depends on the situation.

>>137372246
>3 partners
>not a whore

>>137371693
someone's gonna get btfo

>>137372672
This.

>>137372672
Sluts need to leave. Nobody wants trash.

File: 1407967670469.jpg (26KB, 193x212px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 193x212px

>mfw literally two thirds of anon don't care about purity.

BTFO you enoemous faggots.

File: 1435233629850.jpg (41KB, 447x400px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 447x400px

>>137371900
>>137372025
>feminist sees an attractive women in media
>gets upset because it reminds them of thier own insecurities and inablity to attract men
>throws a shitfit online

>purityfag sees a taken women in media
>gets upset because it reminds them of thier own insecurities and inablity to secure females
>throws a shitfit online

It's like poetry.

>>137372759
Then why haven't you killed yourself yet?

File: 1454572225111.gif (164KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 300x300px

>>137372292
>imying people dont rush into thinking theyve met "the one".

Exactly how many relationships have you been in, anon-kun?

>>137372777
capped

purityfags not welcome

>>137371693
It's starting to slowly balance out. Purityfags literally hopping between IPs to try and convince people they're important.

>>137372246
Spoken like a true cuck.

>>137373126
You flatter yourself anon. Purity fags are, and always will be the majority on /a/. You get go back to /co/ though.

>>137373203
>incorrect statement based on the current best evidence

Nice try purityshit

>All these normalfags.
Disgusting.

I love pure girls but just so I can defile them.
Which am I?

>>137373325
A purityfag. Would you rather stick your dick in a pure girl, or one which tyrone and his buddies jizzed in?

>>137373371
A pure girl but only so I can turn her into my own personal cum dumpster slut who worships my cock.
Do I have to be pure?

>>137373265
What happened? When did /a/ become full of people with shit taste?

>>137373398
you're not a purityfag if you don't know if you are one

>>137373398
No. It depends on if you like pure girls or sluts. Now please vote for purity anon

Reminder you can be lewd and pure at the same time.

>>137373492
Pure is the best kind of lewd.
You see a cute innocent clueless girl who knows nothing about the world of sex and you want to wreak it.

>>137373442
There's a difference between wanting to fuck virgins and thinking all non pure girls are worthless used goods. The latter is a purityfag notion

>>137373600
The only question you need to ask yourself to decide if you are a purity fag is
>would i rather drink an unopened drink, or a drink several aids infected hobos have stuck their dick in?

>>137373761
That doesn't even begin to make sense.

>>137373761
Except that's not it at all. There's an aspect to it that has nothing to do with you fucking the girl.

File: 3449f0f744e8c856a2f3e3874e7cfc2f.jpg (159KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 800x1000px

>>137373565
but I'd rather have a slutty girl wreak me, as I would be the innocent clueless one.

You have to wonder why the girl is no longer with the previous person. Was it because of her or him? If him, is she really that quick to escalate a relationship without knowing that person well?

>>137373788
How does that not make sense
Do you want
>a fresh clean drink
Or
>a drink a bunch of aids infected hobos have jizzed in?
>>137373797
In the discussion of purity fag vs non purity fag, that is the end of the discussion.

>>137373826
WEW
E
W

good taste anon

>>137373848
Let's be honest, it's hard to judge people accurately and people do make mistakes.

If a girl was truly in love, devoted to a guy and then things didn't work out I wouldn't hold her past relationships against her.

It's the "casual sex" sluts that don't value commitment, love and relationships that are the true cancer.

>>137373880
>that is the end of the discussion.

Just because you say that over and over again doesn't make it correct. Liking or disliking a character based on whether she's pure is completely different to how you feel about fucking her. Stop being a retard.

>>137373880
That's not how it works though. There is a huge gradient of sluttiness from pure untouched kissless maiden to cock addicted STD infested whore and everything in between.

>>137371693

>using the jew rubber
Yes goy don't reproduce.

This is why all of you degenerate are going to hell.

>>137373931
Why didn't they work out though? It brings into question her personality. Was she devoted to someone who did not care? Or was scum? Did the man leave because of her? There are reasons for things happening.

For example, yes someone with previous work experience may be better at their job, but if all the previous companies have gone under, or fired her then you should wonder what caused this.

I want to fuck literally every single anime girl, ever. I don't think I'm allowed to like "purity."

>>137373993
What the hell are you talking about mate? That question decides if you are a purity fag, nothing to do with a specific character.
>>137373997
Except it is. Any dicks inside a girl besides their one true love, turns them into garbage.

>>137374089
>whether you want to fuck a girl who's had sex decides if you're a purity fag

You're fucking wrong, retard.

>>137374003
You can also raise concerns about "pure" girls though. Why has she never been in a relationship? Is she that unattractive to the opposite sex? Does she have a ton of red flags that scare off potential suitors? Is she afraid of men? Afraid of sex? Unable to love? And so on.

At the end of the day, judging someone based solely on number of relationships is stupid. Every single person needs to be judged on a case by case basis. For all you know that untouched maiden could cheat on you right away and that slut could end up being the most loyal devoted girl you've ever met.

>>137374117
Except im not. And the fact that you have resorted to insults proves you know i am right.

File: eunuch.jpg (126KB, 362x600px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 362x600px

>>137372292


>not castrating yourself so no whore will ever get the jump on you
>not allowing yourself to be trusted around the women of the most important people in the world because there is no fear of infidelity on your part and using this as a means to obtain greater power and privilege
>not using all that new free time and greater focus to devote yourself to science, scholarship, asceticism and the arts.

plebs, all of you

>>137374089
What if their one true love isn't you? And what if their one true love wants them to fuck dogs? Or other men? Or shit on babies?

Purity is sliding scales that differs from person to person, it's impossible to define.

>>137374124
You'd find those things out before leaping in, that's my point. You shouldn't just pick a random person and start fucking. You need to pick someone you know well and like.

>>137374157
>purityfags don't even know what constitutes a purityfag at this point

A purityfag is someone who labels non pure girls as "used goods" and dislikes them for it overall. I honestly have no idea where you've come up with the idea that it's based purely on whether the anon wants to fuck them based on their sexual history. You're flat out wrong whether I insult you or not. Sorry.

File: tumblr_lzs1c4vhBp1qkqovfo1_1280.jpg (206KB, 728x409px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 728x409px

>>137373192
Spoken like a true airhead

>>137374208
Well then they fuck their one true love and not you. Jesus.

>>137374216
Anon it's just not feasible to find out everything about a person before you "jump in." There is always an element of risk. For all you know the pure girl you devote yourself to decides that "You know what, this dick is good but other dicks might be better" and the next thing you know she's NTR'd you 20 times.

>>137374313
Then you break up with her. She wasnt worth your time. Big difference between being tricked and riding the cock carousel

>>137374313
Do you really think that kind of person wouldn't have any signs before revealing itself? I guess it could happen but it isn't anywhere near likely to.

Also this
>>137374356
Why are you so quick to fuck? There is no rush.

>>137374356
>>137374375
The point is you can never truly know someone, no matter how much you try. Which is why at the end of the day, judging someone solely on "purity" is fucking stupid and illogical.

>>137374229
You dont have to dislike a girl overall, but definitely wont have romantic interest in them.

>>137374428
No, its not. What is illogical is wanting to be romantically involved with a slut. You deserve better anon.

>>137374476
Why are purityfags so black and white about shit. Stop being such an irrational faggot.

>>137374476
But that slut could end up being the best possible partner for you. You never know. A girl being a virgin is no guarantee of her being a good girlfriend/wife.

>>137374511
No.
>>137374533
Well too bad for her. Once a slut, always a slut. You dont love non pure girls.

>>137374533
A slut is a definite negative though. Yes there would be exceptions to that but you shouldn't base the rule around it's outliers.

>>137372408
You obviously have a disillousioned version of reality

>>137374658
You're being irrational and illogical.

>>137374685
No, he just has taste.

File: 1231412.png (452KB, 688x362px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 688x362px

>>137371693
It's over, anyway. Purityfags officially btfo. Time to move on.

>>137374715
So what if i am? Women lose value the more dick they have had inside them.

>>137374724
>almost 50/50
That is far from blown out.

Europe is asleep and slutfag normalfags win the poll. Surprise surprise.

>>137374716
Insecure about your ability to perform?
Dont worry, 3D girls can be more compassionate than you realize. I lasted less than a minute my first time and got a second chance

So this ISN'T a galko thread, right? Good, I can safely close it.

>>137374787
>purityfags are the majority on /a/
>the culture of /a/ is about purity
>everyone who isn't a purityfag is a normalfag
>non purityfags are the vocal minority

these arguments, which are the main arguments of purityfags, are now null. I'd call that btfo.

Supose you have Girl A and Girl B. The girls are clones and are exactly the same, but A is pure and B is not.
You have to choose one of them.
I would pick Girl A 100% of the times and that is because purity is valuable.

>>137374751
I agree with you. I'm just saying that there's way more to deciding on a good partner besides how much dick they've had. I'd take the 10/10 successful loyal girl who had a previous borfriend over the 5/10 fat NEET girl who happens to be a virgin.

>>137374834
Honestly, i wouldnt be surprised if the non purity fags are voting multiple times.

File: 1373253168994.png (309KB, 692x720px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 692x720px

>>137374840
What do we have here? A non-purityfag. And what is he doing? He is blogging about his normalfag life. Wow.

>>137374862
Alright. I suppose i can see some logic in that. But in the scenario, i would rather take neither. I deserve better, and i think you do as well.

>>137374840
>3d girls
Well, i think we can disregard your shit opinion now.

File: unnamed (1).jpg (110KB, 461x568px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 461x568px

>purityfags losing by a landslide
>suddenly all caught up

Hmm.

>>137374848
On weekend /a/ in amerifat prime time. Congratulations.

>>137374834
You actually think Europe would be pro purity? What?

>>137374878
Honestly you got a good chuckle outta me. Try 3DPD. It isnt what we all wish we could have, but it does make your dick feel great for a little while.

>>137374847
Except it is. It is dealing with a type of character in the series.

>>137374956
>amerifats
>probably the most conservative on the board

I will accept those congratulations

>>137374957
East europe by far. Those faggots in western europe may be different.

>>137374906
>I deserve better
Do you really though? Reminder that most purityfags are disgusting ugly otaku that have nothing to offer girls.

Attractive successful virgin girls are top tier in terms of potential partners, I really doubt you qualify as a potential suitor.

>>137374992
This isn't the 60s.

>>137375021
Kek. Anyone on /a/ is probably pretty shit tier, but i can definitely say i deserve better.

>>137375021
>disgusting ugly otaku
The kind of people who judge solely on looks, something out of your control, is not someone you should want to associate yourself with. Also, /a/ is fairly attractive.

I like how every argument non-purityfags have is about 3DPD. Truly shows what kind of people we're dealing with here.

>>137375074
>/a/ is fairly attractive.
What the fuck are you basing that on? Your asshole?

>>137375058
No, its 2016, and the pendulum is gonna swing back. And HARD.

>>137375109
Maybe after Donald wins. Not yet, Jose.

>>137375097
What happened to our /a/? When did all these fedora tipping faggots get here?

>>137375097
You sound like you would like /jp/. Or wizardchan. You should go there.

>>137372777
10/10 would copy pasta.

>>137375108
What are you basing the opposite on? The general masses?

>>137375097
It's really disappointing. Why can't people separate 2D from 3D?

>>137375147
Fuck off back to tumblr. This has always been /a/ not your 3d blogshit.

>>137375158
Logic. People that watch anime for hours, post on 4chan and generally reject 3D girls aren't successful, attractive alpha males.

There are exceptions of course but it's a pretty safe assumption to make.

>>137375074
Ugly or not, bitter people who spend their time arguing about Chinese cartoons on the internet and value a girl's worth by their hymen aren't a girl's first choice.
>>137375097
And what do you think anime is based on? 2D is a creation of the 3D world and is, for the most part, made in its image.

>>137375176
>this has always been /a/
>55% says otherwise

I like how you're statistically wrong now. It's great.

>>137375208
>Reminder that most purityfags
Wouldnt you need to rephrase it to most anime fans then?

>>137375068
Doubt it.

>>137374931
>Implying you cant have sex with 3d girls while secretly projecting 2d fantasies on them.

Seems you need a lesson or two on opportunism, anon-kun.

>>137375241
Except that says what it is right now tonight. Not what it has always been. /a/ has changed and apparently, gone to shit.

>>137375208
Logic. Someone who has interests and is dedicated to them, someone who enjoys themselves enough to spend time alone, someone who purchases ludicrously expensive BD/figures would need money somehow.

There are exceptions of course but it's a pretty safe assumption to make.

>>137372012
Yeah, when someone start a thread like this is just looking for troubles, don't fall in the bait. It would be nice someone actually make a Galko thread.

>no captcha
Why do people still do this? It's like they enjoy a few autists skewing the data.

>>137375282
Doubt what you want, but you are on /a/ too. Wonder what that says. Also like how non purity fags are so quick to jump to personal insults. Must say something about your degenaracy.

>>137371900
Agreed

>>137375282
Doubt what you want, but you are on /a/ too. Wonder what that says. Also like how non purity fags are so quick to jump to personal insults. Must say something about your degenaracy.
>>137375283
You could stick your dick in shit and pretend it was 2d as well.

>>137375289
Are you seriously arguing that the the majority of /a/ users are attractive?

Like do you legitimately believe that based on absolutely nothing?

purityfags are just newfags trying to fit in

>>137375298
It logs the ip adress. You cant vote more than once without changing it.

>>137375348
I'm a purityfag though. I'm just saying that I doubt you qualify as a person who deserves an attractive successful virgin girl.

>>137375381
>pepe
>normies
>my anime

this is the typical purityfag

>>137375358
Are you seriously arguing that the the majority of /a/ users are unattractive?

Do you legitimately believe that based on absolutely nothing?

>>137375358
Are you arguing that the majority of /a/ is unattractive? Based on what? Have you met the majorty of /a/?

>>137375416
Again with the personal insults. You know nothing about me. I however, know everthing about me, and know that I do deserve better.

>>137375447
>>137375448
I've actually met plenty of 4chan users and I can assure you that the vast majority of them are just as you'd expect.

Anti-social ugly virgin manchildren.

>>137375478
That's cool that you think that. And it could be true. Just saying that statistically you're not qualified.

>>137375348
Yeah, but there is a marked difference between a normal girls' vagina and a pile of shit. At least IMO.

>>137375510
4chan is not /a/ and the people who would meet with you or talk about /a/ outside of /a/ are not a good representation of /a/. Fuck off back wherever you came from.

>>137375510
Maybe im a statistical oddity. But i know i deserve better, and im sure you do as well.

>>137375610
>people unironically arguing over something with absolutely 0 evidence aside from anecdote and conjecture

can you stop embarrassing yourselves

>>137375610
I'm really curious as to why you somehow think that /a/ of all boards is filled with attractive individuals,

>>137375634
>i know i deserve better

Can you stop being such a little fucking faggot? No one cares. That's such a disgustingly coneited comment to make. You're incredibly gay.

>>137375653
Who are you quoting?

>>137375677
I'm really curious as to why you somehow think that /a/ of all boards is filled with unattractive individuals.

I don't get purityfag logic. It's almost always based on 3D shit, in which case they need to fuck off.

In 2D a girl can be a massive cum addicted slut and still end up being the perfect waifu. I really don't see the issue.

>>137375684
And you must be terribly insecure to keep insulting me.

>>137375700
>thinks greentexting is used solely for quoting

Nice job purposefully ignoring the point because you know you're being a dumb cunt.

>>137375700
Because I've met 4chan and /a/ users.

And I've seen videos of people that use 4chan and /a/.

And non-retard logic dictates that people who spend the vast majority of their time posting on an anime message board and shunning 3D girls are probably not the most socially capable and attractive people.

Meanwhile you've not given a single legitimate argument as to why you can assume that people on this board are attractive.

>>137375728
>I must be terribly insecure
>repeatedly asserting that you deserve better anonymously online
>I must be insecure

You blew it a long time ago

>>137375725
>in which case they NEED to fuck off.
why? Are our "problematic" opinions triggering you?

>>137375766
Who are you quoting?

>>137375784
I've met 4chan and /a/ users.

I've seen videos of people that use 4chan and /a/.

And non-retard logic dictates that people who spend the vast majority of their time posting on an anime message board and shunning 3D girls are probably the most socially capable and attractive people.

Meanwhile you've not given a single legitimate argument as to why you can assume that people on this board are attractive.

>>137375796
I DO deserve better. That is a simple fact. You seem to be uncomfortable with that however, which i think might be some misplaced jealousy. As a man, you should inspire to be greater, not tare your compatriots down.

>>137375728
Can you give any actual reason as to why you think you deserve better than the average guy?

>>137375845
I very much like how you're just repeatedly confirming that you have absolutely no point.

>>137375848
No. I have no desire to brag. I was simply stating a fact, because an anon kept insulting me. Besides, i believe most men deserve better than used goods.

>>137375865
Just ignore him, it's obvious he's just blatantly baiting at this point.

>>137371693
>http://strawpoll.me/6801452
I feel like I misunderstand what exactly makes a "purityfag". If it's someone that won't even consider a girl if said girl has had a previous sexual partner. Then I'm not a purityfag. However, I would probably avoid a girl who has had a lot of sexual partners.

>>137375847
Asserting something without evidence is the literal defintion of a lesser intellect. I think that's enough evidence to prove that you do not, in fact, deserve shit.

File: 3456789765678765.jpg (23KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 384x384px

>>137375877
>Claims to be stating a fact
>Can't back it up in he slightest

>>137375892
Do you vehemently dislike a girl based solely on her past or current sexual status? No? You're not a purityfag.

>>137375899
Think what you will. I gain nothing out of convincing you otherwise.

>>137375865
I very much like how you're just repeatedly confirming that you have absolutely no point.

>>137375889
まさか。

File: 1371607152761.jpg (16KB, 243x210px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 243x210px

>about 600 votes
>36 posters in thread
Suuuure.

>stuck at 50-50
Obviously not proxyfags trying hard to outdo each other.

>>137375877
>I have no desire to brag
>literally repeatedly bragging over and over

What. saying you deserve better over and over again is bragging. Are you retarded?

>>137375933
I somewhat do, while I somewhat don't. Like I said, if a girl has had sex before or something, ok whatever. If a girl is giant cumslut who's the boy's toilet at scholl, she can fuck off.

>>137375931
It is simply unnecessary to prove anything to you.

>>137375940
>I gain nothing out of convincing you otherwise.
>has been trying to convice people that he deserves better the entire time

RIP

>>137375953
I think you underestimate the amount of lurkers on /a/

>>137375969
You're not a purityfag then.

Purityfags burn copies of BDs and books if a 2D girl they like was even hinted at having a boyfriend.

>>137375957
No. I simply kept getting insulted, to which i corrected other anons. Im done here have fun with your degenerate trash.

>>137375969
If you're in any way okay with a girl who has had sex before then you're not a purityfag

>>137376026
>Gives up because he has no argument.
Literally LOL.

File: 1445647812912.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

A lot of shitflinging and you-said-they-said going on right now, so let's start from square one. The issue is related to an ideal, that women should save their virginity for the special persons they will spend the rest of their lives with.
>a woman should save herself for that special one or else she is worthless and no man should ever date or marry her
This is the argument at hand here, not on an average /a/non's physical attractiveness.
Personally, I think that's ridiculous. Relationships don't always work out, in fact, very few people end up marrying their first boy/girlfriend. The only solution to that problem while holding the purity ideal is to wait until marriage to have sex, but even then divorce is a possibility. And why does this only apply only to women? Hymens? If there was a male equivalent would you say it applies to both sexes?
I'm not saying I wouldn't think that a girl having fucked 100 guys wouldn't be a huge warning sign to me, but ruling out a potential partner because she's made it to a certain point with another in the past seems unreasonable to me?

>>137376024
Well it's not almost 17:1 I can say that much. If you're lurking, say something. Let's see how many people are here. If there are in fact hundreds of lurkers we can kill this thread in minutes.

>>137376100
That's because you're logical and not retarded.

Reminder that 99% of the world doesn't really give a shit about a girls virginity. The only people that do are disgusting otaku and fucking muslim extremists.

Yes a girl having less sexual partners is better but so is them being attractive or rich or if they have a good personality, etc.

Most "purityfags" on /a/ are just ironically shitposting.

>>137376175
Really says a lot when you list personality last.

>>137376100
I think the point of confusion is 2D ideals vs 3D realistic expectations.

In 2D we actually can have that as an ideal because they're not real (or always exactly realistic) people anyway; in 3D it is not so tenable at all.

>>137376204
The problem is that 2D is exactly as you want it.

A slut can be an ideal waifu no problem because it's 2D.

Purityfags always have to result to 3D logic and that's where they fail.

>>137376100
>The only solution to that problem while holding the purity ideal is to wait until marriage to have sex, but even then divorce is a possibility.
That is only extreme cases and accounts for very little amount of non virgin women
If she cant wait until marriage then she i have no interest in her
>And why does this only apply only to women?
No one said that, that applies to males too
This line reeks of tumblr

>>137376342
Male virginity doesn't mean anything and never has. I'm not saying it's okay to fuck random bitches all the time but female "purity" is much more important.

>>137375953
>no captcha
>bait thread
Geez, I wonder what could be happening.

>>137376204
But 2D is created in 3D's image. Genres like SoL and romance are supposed to be realistic in how characters act. A romance about a relationship with no hardships or a SoL where the characters don't act like people and do things people do is missing the point. A purely idealistic story about beings without human's folly would be boring, unrelateable, and serve no purpose outside of maybe wish-fulfillment.
>>137376342
Perhaps I was making an assumption I should not have, but usually when I see these arguments here the topic is always women. Just look at >>137376443
My other points still stand. It's a nice ideal, but unrealistic. While 2D doesn't have to be entirely realistic, it being realistic shouldn't be unwelcome, especially when it comes to how characters act.