>The fourth dimension is literally the X axis

No.

>>137353370
Of course not, anon. It's obviously a new axis, not just the negative x axis.

>>137353397
Nice argument, buddy!

>>137353370
If they are so smart how come they are only 2-D?

>>137353444
>smart people would choose to be 3D

>>137353370
It's just a shitty visualization nigga goddamn.

The director should've just kept the newspaper and speech screenshots montages instead of trying to visually depict something he clearly didn't understand

>harvesting infinite extra-dimensional energy

Why not just draw a teseract?

>>137353840
maybe because its a 5th dimensional shape, rather than a representation of 5 dimensional system.

>>137353840
People are not smart enough to get it.

>>137354002
4th dimensional. why the hell did I go 5D.

>>137353370
>being this stupid

>>137353370

>literally the X axis

>>137353487
>muh perfect being just necessarily exist

Also we've had this thread a dozen times since Dimension W started. Pls.