BREAKING NEWS Japan’s record on women’s rights to face

File: 1320127306941.jpg (357KB, 700x990px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 700x990px

>>137343783
Good to know we can still endorse sexual violence against men because no one ever give a shit about that for whatever reason

[Trap doujins intensify]

>>137343783
>UN
can they fuck off from Japan? no one asks for it.

>>137343783
>>>/v/

Neets gonna flood the streets if the ban is passed

>UN committee
Honestly who gives a fuck. The US never listens to the UN. I assume every where else does the same.

Does anyone listen to the UN? What do they even do nowadays?

You have a right to not be triggered by fictional works - advocacy & governments in 2016 the age of thought police

>Banning rape in fiction
>Only against women
If this passes I will drop out of everything I'm doing and become a politician.

Might as well ban racist words in fiction then. Who cares if it isn't real and the racist words might be said by a fucking racist in the fictional universe, it might offend someone.

How this is even being considered a thing boggled my mind.

File: illya_nope.jpg (191KB, 1197x1077px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1197x1077px

If they find some problems there, what'll happen to my favorite anime?

>reintegration into school textbooks of issue of “comfort women”
Welp that should tell you right there. Hell will freeze over first. Nothing to worry about.

>>137343937
The security council talks about sanctioning people, and occasionally does. However, 1/2 times Ruskies or Chinamen veto, 1/4 times US, France, or Britain veto. Outside of the security council it's a waste of time.

>>137343937
Drive around in white trucks and yell at brown people.

>>137343913
>The US never listens to the UN.
Not everyone here is Clapistani, retard. How many of you fat clappers actually pay for your entertainment?

>>137343894
>NEETs
>going out in the streets

And pigs will fly.

File: japanese_1.jpg (286KB, 462x600px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 462x600px

Japan to reinstate the imperial government again when?

2020
0
2
0

File: 1437424311919.gif (3MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x500px

>>137343937
>Does anyone listen to the UN?

Anita Sarkeesian just got appointed censorship moderator of Twitter.

>>137343783
>against women
Glad that double standard is still there, I was almost surprised.

File: 1453490154267.jpg (87KB, 637x696px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 637x696px

>>137344037

>>137344037
We did in code geass

>>137344065
And who the fuck is that?

>>137343783
>UN comittee
Who cares? It's the UN.

File: CURRENT YEAR-AI.jpg (270KB, 1536x823px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 1536x823px

>>137344051
IT'S FUTURE YEAR PEOPLE!

File: 1455145952793-0.jpg (51KB, 545x754px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 545x754px

>>137344065
twitter is dying

>review
So, they will tell them that they didn't go progressive enough and Japan will say ''We will do better'' without actually doing anything.

Hell, they banned most social studies from their universities already because they realized this shit is dumb as fuck and only damaging a society.

>>137344112
It was fucking stupid to begin with. Not surprising.

>>137343987
Underrated post.

>>137344065
Who? I guess that means they have no power at all.
>>137343913
Russia, China, Koreas, pretty much everyone doesn't listen to them.

>>137343842
traps aren't safe. liberals will just claim they identify as a woman, therefore are women

>>137343783
What about video games or cartoons involving sexual violence against men?
Equality should be equality, no?

The UN can't even get Japan to stop hunting endangered whales.

File: 1416389231530.gif (2MB, 255x234px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 255x234px

>>137344089
Censorship moderator of Twitter.

>>137344112
It's pretty shit other than for news headlines.

>>137344089
your greatest nightmare

File: Sophia.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

Is it time for meme shows to become real?

>>137343986
>reintegration into school textbooks of issue of “comfort women”

This is such a non-starter.

Japan has already apologized to this. The fact that most of the "comfort women" = coerced sex slavery is still debatable.

>>137344011

There sure would be a whole lot of flies though.

>>137344150
>What about video games or cartoons involving sexual violence against men?

>MRA Reacts to Viral News!
>This episode: The UN Bans Problematic Portrayals of Women!

>>137344146
You're thinking of trans

Most traps don't necessarily identify as women, if they consider themselves women, its a slightly different thing.

Traps are just crossdressers that can pass for it

File: Keit-Ai KITAAA.jpg (510KB, 1500x2202px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 1500x2202px

>>137344168
We need meme magic.

It's just one part of what the discussion is going to bring. When the vidja and cartoons come up to the table they'll just push that shit to the side and address some of the other real issues that are listed on there. If I remember right working under a women is still like a super huge deal in nipland, that's probably what they're worried about.

>>137344146
What about the ones that identify as boys but like women's clothing?

>>137343888
Eroge are /a/ related you subhuman retard.

>>137344217
/fa/ browsers?

File: 1418144245649.jpg (51KB, 300x286px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 300x286px

This shit is /v/. Man fuck you faggots, only one fucking anon says something. Take this feminism bullshit back to your containment shithole and stay there.

Saudi Arabia is in the Human Rights Council of the UN

Nobody fucking cares about the UN.

If Japan would care they would have already stopped hunting whales, producing hentai and imported 4 million arabs.

>>137344255
Get the fuck out. This has always been /a/ related. I bet you don't even remember the threads when they tried to ban loli manga. Or the time when they freaked out over rapelay.

>>137344299
Remember when they freaked out over 177 or Saori?

>>137344264
When did they import Arabs?

File: trump16.jpg (3MB, 3890x2768px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3890x2768px

>>137344255

feminism bullshit has also infected /a/nime. It's a fact.

>>137344299
I do and guess what else I remember you fucking vermin? The mod deleting the majority of the threads and anons telling you to fuck off.

>>137344255
>Banning cartoons
>Anime are nip cartoons
Alright.

These threads are good so people can understand what may or may not happen with the anime scene.
Yes, many of them don't happen or don't actually affect anime once they come out. That doesn't mean people shouldn't be aware of whats going on.

>Thread on autosage
Can't wait for the day when something truly will impact anime, and the threads just get deleted/autosaged and no one does anything about it.

>>137344327
I mean they would import arabs if they would listen to the UN demands.

>Japan please take in refugees from Syria as well
>''Okay''
>Japan took in 11 refugees
>''Why are you only taking 11? You were supposed to take thousands''
>''Because those weren't refugees - They were social leeches''
>We take those 11 women and put them under permanent surveillance' - No fuck off we did our part''

>>137344264
But the UN council is still reviewing portrayals.

>>137344345
Subhumans like yourself don't belong in here, they belong to /ANN/, /tumblr/ and /reddit/, where you're supposed to get back to if you believe that eroge weren't /a/ related.

>>137343783

Anime aren't cartoons, so it doesn't matter.

>>137344340
It's them who took the fight here, not the other way around.

>>137343975
There's been a big push in recent years for political correctness, social justice, etc

Its been going on behind the scenes, people say to ignore it and it'll go away, but recently its been taking heavy mainstream effect.

On the flipside, the backlash of this movement causes things like Trump to happen, and gain a lot of momentum.

>>137344340
/a/ - Not anime.

Japan doesn't give a fuck about western tumblrinas.
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-09-20/japan-dumbs-down-its-universities-at-the-wrong-time

>>137344299
>MFW Rapelay incident is 7 years ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zjcZ4VS33U

This shit is still fresh to most /a/nons and /v/erminds.

The fallout from this was epic. Niche gaming publishers decided to be "JAPANESE ONLY" and started to ban non-Japanese IP addresses when visiting homepages.

Anyone smugly going "double standards!" or "what about violence against men?!?!?" Is plainly stupid. It seems pretty obvious that the vast majority of people who would support a measure banning the depiction of sexual violence against women would also be in favor of a similar measure regarding sexual violence towards men. Given that this is a committee about discrimination against women, however, it seems clear why they limited their comments to the issue of discrimination against women.

This holds true regardless of how you personally feel about those comments. Don't be stupid.

>>137344426
>would also be in favor of a similar measure regarding sexual violence towards men
Okay, sure.
Except this is specifically against women, and even says against women.

>>137344348
>These threads are good
No they aren't, go to /pol/ if you want to discuss politics. This isn't anime related and literally always ends up being a general politics thread, not something anime related at all. And it's already starting as you can see.

Anons, every good thing must come to an end eventually, Japan was one of the few places left that was left pure and untainted by "modern thinking". We should be happy we got to experience it at all as our forced children will never know such joys. They will grow up in a brainwashed safe space mentality that will never amount to anything.
The only hope now is war, perhaps another great war can cleanse this world of stupidity, we can only hope.

>>137344455
You can't read, which clearly cements my point that you are an idiot.

>Given that this is a committee about discrimination against women, however, it seems clear why they limited their comments to the issue of discrimination against women.

>>137344423
And nothing has changed.

Those porn producers won't lost their income because some western whores want it. They will just block out the west entirely and pretend it doesn't exist.

The whold world is laughing at the west and its retarded social marxism.

>>137344472
This.

Less rape/haremshit for goobergater shitlords is a good thing in my book.

inb4 landwhale

I'm a man but I'm also a feminist.

>>137344553
>I'm a man but I'm also a feminist.
I'm a cuck.
FTFY

>>137344472
If the threads directly affect how anime is going to be produced, they are /a/ related.

>>137344553
Fuck off. Rape is a common fetish and belongs in the fiction category.
Banning rape is the same as banning any kind of negative things happening in fiction.

It isn't fucking real, it can be whatever it wants to be. That's the entire point of fiction.

>>137344577
the whole "cuck" thing is incredibly boring and not very original.

"cucks" are merely people without double standards who don't mind women living out their sexuality in the same way men do every day.

>>137344599
it may become real at some point since it portrays socially toxic behaviour as if it were normal and some people may find inspiration for real life crime there.

>>137344606
>living out their sexuality in the same way men do every day.
Enjoy being brainwashed.

>>137344617
>it may become real at some point
That is the stupidest thing I've ever fucking heard. Something 2D can't just become 3D.

> since it portrays socially toxic behaviour as if it were normal and some people may find inspiration for real life crime there.
That means almost all videogames should be banned. GTA in its entirety, as there are illegal toxic behaviors.
There is tons of violence in videogames,anime,books, any medium, but they don't need to be fucking banned. If you seriously believe this shit you need to fuck off.

>>137344584
Yeah man, sure is a lot of anime related talk right here. This shit isn't /a/ and only enables /v/ermin that want to talk about their obsession with feminism and social shit that is irrelevant to anime. Neither /v/ermin nor feminism should be on /a/.

>>137344629
enjoy your 50s mindset

>>137344606
>in the same way men do every day
That's sick. Manwhores are just as degenerate. And they don't excuse lose women.
Sure you can sleep around, but you'll lose trust and respect as a result. That's only natural.

>>137344656
Damn straight I will, when men were men.

>>137344655
>UN or Jap has a law being passed that can directly affect anime, doujin, manga, etc
>It isn't /a/ related
Ok.

>>137344654
>That means almost all videogames should be banned. GTA in its entirety, as there are illegal toxic behaviors.
it is, and it should be, but you have to start somewhere. not to mention that too many people still believe that it was okay. it takes time for them to become used to it.

>>137344617
>socially toxic behaviour
This isn't a thing.

Anons, I'm scared. My shitpost detector's false flag meter has just did 360 and rests at zero level now. Please tell me all this tumblrfaggotry is not real.

>>137344680
How can you actually believe that?
Almost all videogames would be gone, thousands of books would be banned, all of anime/manga, and for what? Because people might emulate whats done in them?

You wouldn't be allowed to have bad guys in any media form, because someone might emeulate it.

You're fucking stupid. Kill yourself.

File: 1404674467854.png (168KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 400x400px

>>137344672
>UN or Jap has a law passed
>has

>>137344706
Or may have a law passed. Ideally you'd want people to know about it before it's passed.

>>137344702
It isn't.
It's just one faggot samefagging.

>>137344704
He's brainwashed into thinking people shouldn't be responsible for their own actions. Everyone has to feel safe or else.

>>137344704
>Almost all videogames would be gone, thousands of books would be banned, all of anime/manga, and for what? Because people might emulate whats done in them?
yes.

kids aren't born evil, they're made evil by bad influences.

if you want to create an inclusive, peaceful society that's the right place to start.

>>137344756
I can't believe people like you exist.
You have to be trolling.

Kids aren't supposed to be playing GTA. They do, but that is the parents fault, not the game.

can we delete this thread now? there's enough /pol/ and /v/ shit in here already. this MRA bullshit isn't /a/ related. if they ban all that shit /a/ would improve too because we could actually start discussing good anime for once rather than the harem shit of the season.

>>137344756
>Parents shouldn't be responsible and raise their kids properly.
>Government should have to step in and censor society or else kids will be killers.
Sure, that makes perfect sense. While we're at it, why don't we make thinking a crime as well.

>>137344723
So that they can write a letter to the UN? Nothing fucking happened, nothing will fucking happen and this thread talks about fucking video games and actual feminism plus social garbage. None of this shit is /a/ related.

>>137344787
It's on autosage already. Mods always autosage threads like these, so people can still discuss the social issues that may impact anime.

>>137344782
and the parents obviously aren't doing a good job. not to mention that they'd certainly agree that such games aren't really necessary.

>>137344787
Agreed, can a Mod delete this thread?

>>137344801
they should delete it because this way they're giving /pol/tards and /v/ermin the idea that it was okay for them to be here and that there was space for them to flaunt their misogynist ideology.

>>137344806
Necessary in what way?
If we're going that route, all forms of media aren't necessary.

We should all just study factual things, and not do anything we find enjoyable. No one should be held accountable for their own actions, because everything related to anything bad will be banned.

Kill yourself.

>>137344843
>Kill yourself.
i see you're already out of arguments. nice having a talk.

>>137344835
Nah. I will continue to post about things that may or may not impact Japan's anime/manga distribution.

>>137344863
>Ignores the rest of my post
I see you're fucking retarded, nice having a talk.

>>137344806
There are better ways to ensure kids are not retarded than censorship.
This "safe space" way of going about it is only going to make them worse, if they can't solve problems on their own through learning about life's hardships, how will they ever become a productive member of society?

>>137344883
Of course "he" did, they only read what they want, don't want to feel unsafe.

>>137344806
>>137344756
>Advocating censorship
There are a lot of books on this you might want to read.
Which, by the way, would be banned under your ideas of bad things should be banned.

You all know the counterpoint will be for them to increase their regulations regarding trade laws of their own self respective countries.

It will be a circle debate, every counterpoint will be sprung up that the West has failed to achieve for women. Japan would push for media studies as a relevancy, and they'll have one tiny department created for this research for the issue in a decade.

>>137344782
Not that poster.

The argument that one should or should not ban forms of media based on whether they inspire bad acts is obviously contingent on many empirical and normative claims. The argument that one would simply have to ban too much is not a good argument alone; hypothetically speaking, probably even you, if shown solid empirical evidence that the link between violence in media and violence in real life is sufficiently directly causal and sufficiently strong, would be okay with banning some forms of media. For example, say there was solid evidence that GTA caused, directly, spikes in auto theft and auto-related violence. The simple counterargument of "but you'd have to van so ma y things!" seems awfully insufficient.

The normative question is about where to place that line. It is possible to believe that there should be no line because of an absolute or at least extremely sttong normative belief in the freedom of expression, regardless of its effects. As soon as one begins considering effects, however, one's normative beliefs regarding freedom of expression contends then with other normative beliefs regarding the value of life, safety, etc.

So, first the empirical questions need to be asked. Is there a causal link between the depiction of violence and acts of violence? How directly causal is the link I.e. in the absence of the depiction, how would the effect change; are there other, more direct causes? How significant is the effect?

Then one can contend normatively.

File: 1445094620943.jpg (56KB, 485x459px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 485x459px

>>137343783
>japan ever caring about UN shit

>>137345125
>if shown solid empirical evidence that the link between violence in media and violence in real life is sufficiently directly causal and sufficiently strong,
There are plenty of ''studies'' on that already.
They're shit.

Millions upon millions play GTA for fun. That doesn't mean they go out and steal cars/kill people.
There are other reasons they do that, not because they play GTA and think it's OK.

>>137344065
>Private company on its last leg appoints sock puppet to drive even more people away

The UN didn't force them to do that. A CEO desperate to rekindle his dying company did.

>>137344787
>this MRA bullshit isn't /a/ related.

Found the Tumblr.

Non-Clapistani here, I don't follow the presidential elections but I want to know why Trump is so popular.

>>137345249
>There are plenty of ''studies'' on that already.
>They're shit.

That may be true, but the validity of either their or your claims isn't something that can be determined without actually having these studies in front of us. It is obviously doable. Basically, cite your sources. And obviously those who make claims that there are causal links should cite theirs.

I'm not arguing against you necessarily, but I am pointing out the flaws in argumentation.

>Millions upon millions play GTA for fun. That doesn't mean they go out and steal cars/kill people.
>There are other reasons they do that, not because they play GTA and think it's OK.

It doesn't need to affect everyone, or even most people who are exposed to it, for there to be a case. It just needs to affect enough people; that is, have a significant enough effect under some normative schema.

Consider driver's licenses, to continue our auto-themed examples. There are many reasons to have them, obviously, but one is public safety; one needs to be certified that one has some basic understanding and experience driving a car under restrictions in order to be able to drive one without those restrictions. That's not to say that most people who drive a car would necessarily otherwise be accident-prone if the requirement for licenses disappeared overnight, but it is true that quite a few people would; obviously, there are car accidents even among those with licenses. And that effect is significant enough that everyone who wants to drive a car has this requirement, almost a kind of penalty, under the normative schema the lawmakers had in mind when the law that requires licenses was made.

>>137345469
Memes.

>>137345499
Even if 10000 out of 10million people were affected by it, it wouldn't justify banning it.

>>137345469
Trump is literally a meme, nothing more.

>>137345520
And that is, as they say it, just your opinion, man.

So obviously you have a strong belief in the freedom of (some kinds) of expression, such that you value it highly relative to an abstract risks to life. Do you believe that other people can reasonably disagree with you? If not, why not?

File: 1455058585146.jpg (48KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x375px

>>137344553
>I'm a man but I'm also a feminist.

>>137345595
Of course people can disagree with me. I'd explain a lot more and probably give you a paragraph or two but the thread is on page 10 and will die soon. I'd like to discuss this topic some other time.

Oh well.

>>137345595
>And that is, as they say it, just your opinion, man.
No, that's just you not understanding/refusing to accept how scientific methods work and how statistics work.

So ironically, you're the one putting fingers in your ears to shut out the disagreeable part.

>>137343783
The SJW are now coming for your Animu, /a/.
How will you respond?

>>137345729
With my dick out.

>>137345729
Complain on the internet.

>implying you can stop the New World Order

>>137345640
You're pretty stupid, or you didn't understand the implication. Empirical facts are empirical facts, but whether or not they justify or don't justify action is a normative question. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and clarify; the part that is "just one's opinion" is whether or not any particular number justifies or doesn't justify banning depictions of violence, and these normative beliefs can be reasonably disagreed with.

>>137345752
Obviously this is not the statement that all normative beliefs are reasonable. There are many that are simply logically untenable by themselves, or beliefs might be inconsistent between one another.

File: The future of mankind.jpg (204KB, 1600x600px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1600x600px

Memes are real

>>137344553
Maybe one day that girl you're trying to fuck will see this post and you'll get some pussy.

Fuck off, you're all the same.

>>137345963
It was a prediction of mankind's future.

>>137345963
>that logo
Kek, Funi did this?

weh