"The fanservice in Kill la Kill isn't that bad"

>>120991625
5 minutes till the dub is on adult swim.

>>120991657

I don't watch Adult Swim, I thought they aired it at 12:30? Or did standards actually watch the show and decide maybe they should air it later?

>>120991625
You mean 5 minutes until an hour ago for the dub?

The plot was literally designed around what would allow for maximum fanservice

>>120992070

And yet people tell me not to treat it like ecchi. Why, Anon? Why?

Because the whole show is built around desensitizing you to the female body, so that by the time everyone is literally naked it doesn't feel weird anymore.

It's like no one actually watched the show or something.

>>120992146

By "weird" you mean "fanserving", and by "not weird anymore" you mean "no longer seeming like ecchi"?

Something must be wrong with me then, because I've watched KLK tits to toes and I still came out thinking "There's no way comes within spitting distance of American TV."

It was hard not to get an erection during that scene.

>>120992238
They showed Blood+

>>120992238
>There's no way comes within spitting distance of American TV
What does that mean? You think American television can't have fanservice?

>>120992337

I don't remember much fanservice/nudity in Blood+. Not like KLK for sure. And Adult Swim has come out specifically with a "no ecchi" policy for their anime pickups. But then again I didn't watch Blood+ as religiously as I watched KLK, so I don't know how far it takes things.

>>120992335

It's hard for me not to get an erection for most of KLK.

>>120992373

They don't have what KLK is selling. But I meant specifically that it can never air on Adult Swim, who has an actual policy against teen ecchi hijinks.

>>120992238
Oh you're right, there's no way the general American TV audience wont throw a fit over this show. And that's because they're dirty Americans with their shitty western mindsets that feel the need to take everything out of context and get angry about things that don't mean anything to them.

>>120992583

But how does the context un-ecchi the content we see? We can say "It looks like ecchi if you take it out of context." Is it somehow not when we put in in context?

>>120992432
I didn't get a boner during the entire show. And hell, I even jacked off to Panty & Stocking.

>>120992822

You're a stronger man than I am. I was beaten by both shows.

And yet, both shows people tell me "Oh, it's not ecchi, it's satire so it doesn't count." To which I say "Anything is satire if you take it to ridiculous enough extremes."

>>120992739
The context is you watched the rest of the show and therefore witnessed the gradual decrease of "sexual" content, and the increase of nudity in normal circumstances. Compare the beginning of the show to the end: At first it's full of ridiculous ass and tits shots and characters reacting to that, and that eventually develops into the more "creepy" stuff with Ragyo (to establish that she's "evil"), but by the end of the show the only real references to sex or nudity are jokes about the Nudist Beach guy's glowing wangs. The culmination of this was the final episode, where the fact that literally everyone is naked is an afterthought compared to the rest of the scene.

But America would look at that last episode out of context and say "LOOK AT THIS GODDAMN SEX ORGY WE CAN'T HAVE THIS ON TV".

Kill la Kill did everything right

got me hyped
got me boned up
got me laughin

everything a show like this should have

>>120992119
Tumblr, mainly.

Tumblr has enacted a series of mental gymnastics to justify the fact that they like KlK, when in reality, they just have shitty taste.

Was it really needed for Ragyo to rape her daughters? I mean really, did that have to happen? It ruined the whole show for me due to how they played both scenes up as fanseverice despite how Satsuki and Ryuuko were in those scenes. This anime is pretty sexist.

>>120993190

And that's great, but people don't wanna call it a show that gets you boned up. They wanna treat it like a normal action show. Whereas I'm like "Just let it be ecchi. You'd treat any other show with this content like ecchi, why should KLK be any different?"

>>120993137

So towards the end of the show you'd say the nudity, while more and more prevalent, isn't meant to be fanservice? I'm not seeing how. I see that there's "creepy" stuff, but I don't see why the nudity should be an afterthought unless you can compare that nudity to other portrayals of nudity and show why it's not fanservice.

>>120993245
lol like tumblr could recognize satire and fun ever

>>120992739
>Is it somehow not when we put in in context?

In context is creepy. You can still get turned on, and I don't doubt that a lot of people do, but that's the mother and main villain sexually harrassing her daughter.

>>120993330

In an ecchi, Anon? Absolutely, because that shit's hot.

But probably not if you mean to be a show taken seriously. Unless it's one of those serious molestation scenes, which it doesn't look like. Not going by what I know of molestation scenes, at least.

>>120993333
Again, did you watch the show? In that last episode everyone is practically a naked fleshblob, good luck getting a boner to that.

I'm not arguing that KlK has NO fanservice, they just get it out of their system up front for the sake of their weird pro-nudist themes or whatever that was supposed to be.

Why would it be a big deal to show this on Adult Swim when they routinely show ridiculous amounts of gore in every episode of Metalocalypse?

You're the same faggot who made the thread about how the show was ecchi. We already destroyed your last hilarious argument. What's your point now?

>>120993330
It's almost like they were trying to portray her as totally immoral and evil or something.

>>120993245
I mean, it never gave *me* a hardon, so I can see why people wouldn't treat it like ecchi. Then again, I also don't watch porn and very rarely jerk off (once a month or so on average), so maybe I'm just odd.

>>120993343

So it's not a fanservice molestation scene, it's a serious, creepy molestation scene. Like in Aku no Hana.

But this is why directors and junk, when they wanna do a rape scene or a sex scene or something, they have to do it the right way. You can't just frame porn in context and say it's no longer porn, that's why everyone laughed at Brown Bunny.

>>120993441
You actually found Ragyo touching Satsuki all over like some sort of human snake and her flat out fingering a mind broken Ryuuko hot? You have some screwed up fetishes anon.

>>120993449

>In that last episode everyone is practically a naked fleshblob, good luck getting a boner to that.

I buy that. A mass of undetailed ambiguous nude blobs could be seen as "not fanservice", you can't even see anything. But on the other hand, it keeps up the shows premise of being actually about clothes and not wearing them. On paper you can't get more ecchi than that.

File: ryuko-x-nui15.gif (3MB, 430x242px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 430x242px

It isn't. The fanservice in Kill la Kill is good.

>>120993627
Where do you think we are?

>>120992432
Blood+ had the rape scene.

>>120991625
Old Boy isn't a porn because it has a sex scene.
x^D

>>120993503

You didn't destroy my argument because I didn't get very many posts at all. It was all complaints about my OP being executed wrong. With the occasional "60% of people watch KLK for the tits" and I think only one "Here's why I think it's not ecchi."

>>120993729
At least they were respecful enough to not show Diva straddling him. Just the before with her disrobing and the after with her re dressing while his shocked body is on the floor. Kill la kill showed Ragyo fingering Satsuki and Ryuuko multiple times.

>>120993563

To be honest, my point is only that it was a creepy molestation scene. It's absurd to deny that there's fanservice in KLK, and you're right in saying that the scene is made to look kinda erotic. Things would be easier if we could admit that fanservice by itself doesn't add or detract merits to the plot.

>>120993686
There was not enough naked Nui in that show.

>>120993748

I believe there's a right way and a wrong way to sex scenes. An ecchi/hentai way, and a tasteful/"don't take this erotically this a romantic/tragic moment" way. And it's not just about context.

File: 1405511181975.jpg (78KB, 639x700px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 639x700px

>>120993829
Agreed.

>>120993798

That there, that's a pretty fair way to do a rape scene, I think.

>>120993685
"On paper", sure, but in practice it's not particularly "sexual", and it would only seem like fanservice to someone who, again, didn't watch the rest of the show.

>>120994050

So you can't really get off to an undetailed blob of indiscriminate nudity. But how am I supposed to take the concept then? It is a show about nakedness. How am I supposed to treat a show that is actually based around that? It'd be like a show that's about working in the porn industry, shows pornographic activity, but in such a way that isn't all that fappable. So I can say, "This isn't all that fappable." But the show's concept, how am I supposed to approach this?