Archived threads in /3/ - 3DCG - 27. page

make ur own

spooky

>>569927
Unless you're going to spend a good amount of money you won't really find anything

make your own

>>569672
>http://imgur.com/a/Rft2Z
antialiasing/10

>>569673
haha off to a great start i suck

>>569676
nah, the models are k I guess but the jaggy outlines are ruining it.

Poles nigga

>>569191
Too many poles on this model 0/10 would not animate.

>>569259
What is a pole?

>>569865
>Blander
Indeed.

cycles is killing blender.

someone teach me lux please

>>569865
>generic sob story
>and it's all thanks to Blender!

What textures? Grass - you will have to tile with better. Trees - you have to set Alpha channel for the texture. You dont have to put render in quotation marks, you pretentious underage, if it's real time render is still render.

>>569870
Your alpha channels aren't set up apparently, also that grass texture looks bad even if you showed me this 15 years ago. get with the times and use generated and/or scanned foliage.

>>565962

File: char.png (280KB, 555x842px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 555x842px

I was hoping to bring it into zbrush and add more detail. the topology is pretty bad though.
plan to make highpoly then retopo.

File: BeTseMY.png (95KB, 522x386px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 522x386px

yes, I am a 3d noob.

>>564770
>why does it matter ?
It doesnt. It all depens on what do you want to achieve or what you can do. Heres a thesis ive heard: Modelling - max, animation - maya.

It really depends on what you want to do.

If you're interested in 3D printing mechanical things, industrial CAD or (industrial) prototyping, I'd reccomend autocad.

For more 'creative' or more hobbyist jobs I'd recommend sticking with Blender.

>>564772
>>564771
thats what I've grasped, too .
I will probably go with max and leave Blender,
because I want to go professional and render /model some scenes for my portfolio, and no animations.

File: Ruby Rose - Anime Eyes Test.png (174KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 960x540px

Close up of Ruby Rose's head and comparison to official model from Grimm Eclipse

File: Ruby Rose - Sleepwear Outfit.png (144KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 960x540px

Ruby Rose Pajamas Vol 1

File: Ruby Rose - Skimpy Gym Outfit.png (202KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 960x540px

Ruby Rose Sports Outfit

>>569580
did you make the assets or did you take em from somewhere?

>>569585
Depends on scene, but most models are myne.

Especialy in Ania's projects.

>>569586
Then they're good.

I feel ya mane, why did Pixologic have to kill it in its infancy, whyy

File: 365858.gif (2MB, 360x364px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x364px

>>560402
well, seems like it all worked perfectly according to plan.
this small program made a big ruckus all over the web back then and many didn't see the necessity to obtain zbrush anymore. the majority of non-professionals who get zbrush usually forget about it quickly again after they realize they don't have any talent for sculpting anyways.

the main danger though was that the programmer of it is actually fucking clever and the program developed incredibly fast with stunning new technology inside (the realtime triangle subdivision that no one else had back then). this crossed the line and it was pretty obvious that either Autismodesk or Picklelogic would buy it to neutralize it.

funniest part about it was that the developer was bragging about how this is actually great for sculptris and how he moved from (sweden?) to some sunny office in the states and only a couple months later there were news that he actually left them again or maybe got fired.
so in the end the application stalled, they took all the code and the developer was only kept as long as they needed him to help implement his code into zbrush.

all of this shows how important it is that something like blender stays fucking open source at all costs.

File: 1483911061266.gif (1MB, 320x213px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x213px

>>560409
>the developer was only kept as long as they needed him to help implement his code into zbrush.

Except Zbrush still doesn't have any kind of realtime subdivision. This is how scummy Pixologic is, even Blender got dynamic sculpting topology before Zbrush. In the newest version of Zbrush instead of implementing something useful they're bragging about how they finally implemented a traditional 3D manipulator, something every other modeling program has had for years. I used to be big into Zbrush but as every new release gets less and less impressive I get the feeling that they're just stalling like Autodesk does with Maya.

>>569212
I'm in the same boat. Itd actually what prompted me to try daz for the first time but they were too detailed and too difficult and time consuming to set up.

There really is a lack. Especially of a variety of ethnicities too. I work in Asia and we have this client who almost got upset there were no pretty Asian girls shown around in our real-time render.

When necessary to show big areas with civilian / pedestrian and traffic flow we use twinmotion, and it's got a good variety of people. I haven't tried to rip the models from there but that's doable, you can set up paths for them to walk too

>>569224
>I'm in the same boat.
Yes. We're all looking for female packs but they seem to be rare and expensive these days.

>>569224
OP here, we're actually making the switch from Twinmotion to UE4, because we are doing huge scenes and Twinmotion just can't keep up and there's no way to optimize anything..

We did a 50k square meter retail store and it's just no fun to present that at 10 FPS.

But populating areas is amazing in TM. We're looking to create similar tools in UE4 but with the lack of females it's a shitload of work. I'm really excited about Twinmotion 2018 but I doubt it can handle our large scenes much better desu.

What do you think it would cost to hire a studio to make a nice female pack?

>>569630
It's a cool idea. Most Voronoi implementations are kinda meh though. Which is a shame since the algorithm is capable of creating an endless variety of patterns.

https://vimeo.com/122815674

>>569641
That's more due to all the different types distance measuring rather than the algorithm itself, though.

>>569630
>Is Voronoi a meme?
Yes but it looks cool

>>567019

I have been wanting this since 2001. Sadly, this world is full of stupid shit. And people who might want to have these things. Are not the ones who can make it happen.

I'm 100% sure this will be a thing in maybe 2050ish. I doubt any sooner. Hell probably once humanity gets its shit together. We will all be artist / modelers / animators and musicians...

Would be a much more creative and interesting world.

The levels people would have to go to make something truly stand out would be astronomical...

All well. See you on the other side anon. We will not live to see such a future.

>>567019
rigging and retopo will be automated, animation is also getting there. texturing becomes soooooo much easyer!!

but still, I'm shocked that there is no better retopo tools ...

>>567031
ps. as distant future goes...IDK. one thing I can not gasp to be automated is creativity. but, i think all this collected search data will be used in creating it.
then science will become art like art

>>569653

fuck off

Shit, I haven't touched Cinema in years, but I think you're in the right path, you have to make a second effector. But maybe you have to set it differently. Try parenting the cloner to another one of those green things (mograph tool, i think it's called, maybe like, a fracture) and then applying the second effector.