This 4chan thread was originally archived from /b/ on February 03 2014 @ 03:49:02 PM. views: 1,745 / takedown request / homepage


Support 4archive by donating or clicking our ads. Thanks.


File: BMDNK19.jpg-(192 KB, 2070x729, Exhibit_A.jpg)
192 KB
Greetings gentlemen.

I believe that I have discovered a new Pornography phenomena – what one might even be quick to label a "conspiracy" – wherein certain commercial Pornographers will re-enact popular "amateur" photos with professional models in an attempt to capitalize on the subconscious wish that more images exist within a "series" of images for which the original "sauce" has hitherto been unknown. The masturbator, presumably, would be unwittingly lured in to subscribing to the commercial website under the pretense that "moar" images exist of the "amateurs" portrayed, only to realize later on that the "new" images in the series are the product of paid professionals and not, much to his disappointment, the "amateurs" in the original photographs both discovered and enjoyed in the days of yore.

As a demonstration of my theory I present to you here, Exhibit A. Notice how closely the contents of the original, "amateur" image (displayed on the left) are mirrored in the professionally-produced image (displayed on the right). This includes, but is not limited to the clothing of the subjects, their bodily positions and spatial relations, and even the black bag positioned between the couple and the actress who is portraying the "friend". One would be hard-pressed to believe that such similarities are merely coincidental.
>>
File: d2KxXqM.jpg-(128 KB, 1368x575, Exhibit_B.jpg)
128 KB
Presenting, secondarily, Exhibit B. In this particular pairing, we notice a similar phenomena: The professionally-produced image (displayed here the right) has attempted to imitate the contents of the believed-to-be "amateur" photo (on the left). Notice, in this particular instance, the left-most female subject's hairstyle, her bracelet, and even the curvature of the penis which she holds in her right hand.

With that being said, gentlemen, I hereby welcome any corrections to or rebuttals against my theory as proposed above. Should you be in agreement with me, I would urge you to Post similar image pairings so that we might collect more evidence in support of our theory. Alternatively, I welcome you also to Share, Like, and Favorite this message in order to spread Awareness of this underhanded attempt to profit off the lowly desires of the lone masturbator.

Yours in Masturbatory Solidarity,
Jonathan B. Wigmore
London, UK
>>
well, tjis is interesting.
>>
You must be the king of photo hunt, but yes I can admit that I have sworn that I saw similar images from the amateur section mixed in with pro's, but now I a m thinking they are remakes.
>>
>>530607352
>>530607426
Which you had more. It'd be fun to see lots.
>>
king of reverse image searchers, give us moa =-O
>>
Well done sir
>>
>>530609512

I too wish the same and will call on you, Fellow Masturbator, to aid me in collecting more samples of this curious phenomena.
>>
>>530609729

Thank you, Friend.
>>
Show this to /x/

I think they'll appreciate this more than /b/
>>
>>530610091

I shall cross-post, post-haste!
>>
>>530607352
I think it's more along the lines of: "that's hot, let's do that"
>>
>>530610395

"That's black purse between them is even hot. Lets put it there too!"
>>
File: u3rJkYJ.png-(635 KB, 527x536, meh.png)
635 KB
>>530610606
holy shit you're right
Wtf? That's not even copying, that's making a goddamn remake.

Of a single picture.
>>
>>530610091
>>530610294

>>>/x/14120056
>>
>>530607352
source on the pic to the left
>>
This is literally the most groundbreaking post I have seen on /b/ in my 4 years of being here.

Good job.
>>
oh wow this is facinating almost epic. Anyone got any more proofs?
>>
File: Ah74kgo.jpg-(13 KB, 500x363, 1378087987219.jpg)
13 KB
>>530610606
>>530611260

This anon >>530609689
might be onto something. Maybe they're so perfectly emulated so that a reverse image search of a popular amateur picture will result in a link to the professional video.
>>
>>530611645

Thank you friend. Please Like, Share, and Favourite this Post so that my theory above may gain the extended exposure that it deserves.
>>
>>530611776

I only wish I had, Friend. I am hoping here that the gentlemen of the Internet could assist me in locating other similar attempts of re-enactment
>>
>>530611787
Tested my hypothesis. Reverse image searching both pictures only results in websites that seem to fill their pages with popular images in order to drive traffic.
>>
>>530612797

Interesting discovery..
>>
bump
>>
This is twisted in a way.
But very interesting.
>>
>>530614605

Indeed..
>>
That's it? Only two images? Weak sauce, OP
>>
>>530607352
With regards to Exhibit A, I do believe the porn on the right was made first, and the "amateur" on the left is a recreation of the famous porn image
>>
>>530614886

Perhaps you could assist me in finding more, Fellow Masturbator. I would be happy to give you full credit in the final, published version.
>>
>>530607352
>>530607426
Interdasting.
Also London sucks but it's better than the black country
>>
>>530615175
I think you're right
>His shirt
>>
>>530615287

Thank you, Friend.
>>
oh god someone screencap this, this is perplexing.
>>
File: bYWTGOK.png-(466 KB, 1040x593, tadaa.png)
466 KB
>>530615175
True; I have the full vid of pic on the right. Observe!
>>
>>530615571
>>530615175

First: no. The amateur image was first.

Second, this is neither "interesting" nor a conspiracy. It is not more interesting or conspiracy than "Shaving Ryan's Privates" or "Star Whores".

It is common as shit to take popular imagery/fiction and turn it into porn. That porn makers would turn extremely popular one off amateur pics/scenarios into a porn is fucking expected and obvious.

Jesus christ.

That said, there could be some pretty cool recreations out there, so by all means find as many as you can. But drop the surprise, because that's stupid.
>>
>>530615969
go for it
>>
>>530615969

How?
>>
holy shit!
>>
File: rGgi87E.png-(567 KB, 974x740, Captureytryrt.png)
567 KB
>>530616124
The cumshot.
>>
>>530616132
Really?

the image on the right is a still from a video that has been around for a while now.

this is the first time i've seen the image on the left
>>
>>530607426
nice bands in the background
>>
>>530616489
share to Mega?
>>
>>530616495

The image on the left is old as shit. It was floating around here years ago.

I remember when the video came out and people were loving the fact that they did that.
>>
There is an amateur version of this somewhere: http://www.analsex-maniacs.com/gallery1/pic6/amateur-girfriend-revenge-home-porn-7/images/5.jpg

Please help me find it.
>>
>>530616132
As a professional pornographer I can confirm this. Hell, I come on here specifically to learn exactly what kind of depraved shit really get you neckbeards' hooked, within legal limits, then recreate it and sell it to you.
>>
>>530616489
I second this >>530616737
>>
>>530616489
i fucking love this video
>>
>>530607426
First pic piqued my interest, everything in those images is very convincing to a "remake" but this second one isn't that good. Girls kissing during dual handjob/blowjobs is very common, as is jewelry and certain hair styles
>>
I'm hot on the trail of another image pair.
>>
>>530607426
Amon Amarth that's a good band
>>
>>530616495
No, he's right. That image on the left was posted all the fucking time 6 years ago and probably even a little longer ago then that. That GFRevenge video on the right is no older then about 2010
>>
File: SyvmZtJ.jpg-(62 KB, 546x713, 5~2.jpg)
62 KB
>>530616930
Yes! You have fallen for my trap
>>
File: KeeiuId.png-(673 KB, 1153x762, ghjghh.png)
673 KB
>>530617434
It's a great vid....! The girl on the right is Havoc Hailey by the way. Jus' sayin.
>>
>>530616975

It's so obvious (regardless of whether or not anon is actually a pornographer) that it's a bit amazing to me that it would even come as a surprise.

Porn guy: Hmm, this amature picture of this skinny teen chick with yoga pants and converse on getting fingered in a doctors office is being posted all over the interwebs.

Porn guy 2: Hey, how about we make a video with similar lighting and a similar girl getting fingered and then fucked in a similar Dr's office and recreate the scene that plays in your head when you look at that picture.

Porn guy 1: GENIUS!

Porn guy 2: Well it's pretty obvious, really.

Porn guy 1: GET THE FUCKING CAMERA YOU'RE A GENIUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Porn guy 2: Dude, seriously, calm the fuck down.

Porn guy 1: SOOOO DIABOLICAL! TAKE SOMETHING THEY ALREADY FIEND FOR AND... AND MAKE IT PRO!!!!!!! HAHAHA. IT'S AMATEUR TOO SO WE DON"'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT COPYRIGHT ISSUES!! YOU'RE AN EVIL MASTERMIND.

Porn guy 2: Please get out of my house.
>>
So no uploads to Mega?
>>
>>530607352

i knew about the original one...the guy on the left has such a hot ass unffff then i saw the video of the one on the right and the dude is nasty as fuck
>>
>>530618143

I'm not even a homophobe but this somehow made me uncomfortable. So earnest.
>>
>>530617994
No... just no you fucking faggot.
>>
>>530616975
>recreate it and sell it to you.

>implying anybody online buys porn ever
>>
>>530611645
newfag.
>>
>>530617994
>It's so obvious
>writes out a gay roleplay
you suck
>>
>>530618361

#REKT
>>
>>530617994
Also, since the source material is amateur, you can have really low production values.
>>
File: C749VgJ.jpg-(69 KB, 1024x768, fete_hot_29.jpg)
69 KB
FOUND ANOTHER DUPE!

Amateur attached.
Professional here: http://galleries.pichunter.com/krawl/321/3216567/index.html

!!!
>>
>>530618604

#REKT

Let that anger flow.
>>
>>530607352
no shit op, its called marketing
>>
>>530618769
not angery, just think you're a faggot
>>
>>530618604
>>530618361
>>530618870

lol butthurt morans who couldn't deduce their way out of their mother's vagina
>>
>>530618698

I'd really like to sleep with those babes in that picture my friends. Hubba hubba. XD
>>
>>530618921
keep sucking that fags dick